Article View: bit.listserv.physhare
Article #1630Re: Food for thought
From: Paul Hickman
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 13:39
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 13:39
104 lines
5130 bytes
5130 bytes
Here is some food for thought! ------------------Forwarded message: I remember what Feyman often repeated when he was teaching Advanced Field Theory while dying (He died with his boots on, so to speak, giving his last energy to students with frightening sincerity). He would say, "The biggest problem with being a student is that you're always too busy getting an education to learn anything." Now I call this "Feyman's Theorem on Being a Student". It would have sounded trite - were I myself not being torn at that moment by a horrible quandary - preparing for candidacy exams while deep in the middle of a slow digestion of Hawking and Ellis. I was so angry at having to interrupt my intellectual life to satisfy some arbitrary sociological determination of what "an educated person" was supposed to know about the nuclear shell model and other fantastic bits of physics trivia that I could barely eat all year. But at least I felt validated in my frustration by Feynman. He neglected his committee work, people say he let his colleagues carry his advising burdens, but he never succumbed to the pomposity of "the educational process." He literally taught until he could no longer stand, and after that he asked us permission to teach sitting down, taking bites from candy bars to maintain enough of a blood sugar rush to last out the hour. After class I know he was in pain, but he never let us see it when he was teaching. And then one day he even took a half hour out of class time to prepare us for his death. He wanted his class to know that he was facing it very soon and with a calm curiousity, even. I really wish he was still here to take part in this debate. In her "Wickedary" - an anti-"dick-tionary" by radical pagan feminist Mary Daly, she defines the word "academentia" as: normal state of persons in academia, marked by varying and progressive degrees; irreversible deterioration of faculties of intellectuals And then she has the phrase: abominable snowmen of academentia: freezers and packagers of learning; chilling throng of frigid fellows, specialists in verbigeration and refrigeration of knowledge. I think part of the fascination science holds for me is that we humans can still do it despite the tendency to become academented, to vertigerate, to bibliolate. (Bibliolater: a hot air type who attempts to contain the universe within the confines of one bible/bubble.) My conclusion: all this discussion of how to fine-tune the Machine that drips knowledge drop by expensive loan-financed, degree-certified drop into the mouths of supplicants (i.e. paying customers) is IMHO a kind of stabilizing small-scale turbulence comforting, but helpless against a large-scale perturbation. What will we do if the rate of communication transfer in society increases to such a magnitude that the concept of Intellectual Property becomes unenforceable, and people are able to feed themselves at any trough they want to without paying for the expensive IV hookup called a Professor in a classroom? Maybe we can use the old boring excuse "most people are too stupid and lazy to challenge our empire by being smart without our permission and recognition" to omit this possibility from our "shopping list" for instituting educational re-form. But what if it happens anyways? As we have seen in a number of famous "who ordered that" experiments, Nature can always appear outside the boundaries of our previous extrapolations, especially when our objectivity is colored by disdain for effects semantically disregarded as being minor. I remember when a friend of mine, a Russian physicist who was writing brilliant papers in conformal field theory, and other related subjects in string theory, was forced through the indignity of being a graduate student in Princeton in order to acquire his PhD to be officially considered as adequate in doing what he already had been doing superlatively for many years. He failed his qualifying exam! Oh No! Now he can never become "a physicist." Darn. If you learn too much, you do run the risk of endangering your education! This is a corollary to Feynman's above-mentioned Theorem on Being a Student. - patricia. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did. Paul Paul Hickman Physics Belmont HS
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9402221320.AA16562@copernicus.bbn.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!COPERNICUS.BBN.COM!phickmanShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 16cfd8,baa68c1f2d5cb52,start X-Google-Attributes: gid16cfd8,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-02-22 05:39:01 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!COPERNICUS.BBN.COM!phickman Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.physhare Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU,@PSUVM.PSU.EDU:owner-physhare@PSUVM.PSU.EDU> Return-Path: <@PSUVM.PSU.EDU:phickman@COPERNICUS.BBN.COM> Message-ID: <9402221320.AA16562@copernicus.bbn.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 08:39:01 -0500 Sender: Sharing resources for high school physics <PHYSHARE@PSUVM.BITNET> From: Paul Hickman <phickman@COPERNICUS.BBN.COM> Subject: Re: Food for thought Lines: 103