🚀 go-pugleaf

I echo the words of my fellow physics instructor below.  I'm sure you can
find equipment that does more, but I doubt they can match the quality,
value and support you find with Vernier.  I use this equipment
extensively and have not ever had a piece not work as promised or break.
The hardware/software is of quality construction and at a price that
beats the socks of most other suppliers.  They even offer kits so you can
assemble some of the equipment yourself.  I assembled my own photogates
and interface boxes and saved a bunch of money.  The instructions were
easy to follow and accurate.

Tom Brestel
tbrestel@courier.esu11.k12.ne.us
Holdrege Sr. High
Holdrege, NE

On Sun, 26 Mar 1995, Raymond A. Rogoway wrote:

> No question about it. I have been using Vernier for years. I also have IBM PS
> Lab. But Vernier wins hands down in the following areas.
> (1) easier to expand and to create new interfaces. (2) cost. (3) very strong
> analysis section in software, finds tangent, detailed analysis of sections of
> graphs, integrates, and curve fits. (4) extremely strong tech support, if you
> have a question just contact Dave Vernier and he gets right back to you. IBM
> lacks flexibility and customer support.
>
> WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
> Ray Rogoway
> Independence High School
> fax: (408) 926 6785
>
> The woods are lovely dark and deep
> but I have promises to keep
> and miles to go before I sleep and
> miles to go before I sleep.
>
> AOL:      rayrogoway@aol.com
> internet: rogoway@nes.nersc.gov
>           rrogowa@cello.gina.calstate.edu
> WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
>