Article View: bit.listserv.physhare
Article #46Reply: Voltage and Van de Graaff
From: Larry Brown
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 1995 00:00
22 lines
1554 bytes
1554 bytes
Bob, After reading the explanation so ably written by Don Simanek, I'm tempted to keep silent, but... I agree completely with Don. The Mechanical Universe (High School Adaptation) gives these analogies: the electric field is like the gravitational force on, say, a ball on a hill side; it is down the slope in the direction of maximum value; the electric potential is the height above some point (sea level, the bottom of the hill, etc). It is as if you climb a hill (increasing the voltage, doing work against the field) and reach a plateau, or a lake, which will be flat, no gravitational force in the direction of motion, and therefore representing constant potential. SO, outside the Van de Graaff, the voltage is going (actually negative, since it is being charged with electrons) up as points closer and closer to the dome are considered. But once inside the dome, the voltage is relatively constant (high value, but constant), and the field is essentially zero, within conditions mentioned by Don in his last paragraph. Fun stuff. It sure "turns on" the kids. Larry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<950602095537_84436465@aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 16cfd8,5e25a839fa6fdee0,start X-Google-Attributes: gid16cfd8,public From: Larry Brown <LGBMPA@AOL.COM> Subject: Reply: Voltage and Van de Graaff Date: 1995/06/02 Message-ID: <950602095537_84436465@aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 103688294 sender: Sharing resources for high school physics <PHYSHARE@PSUVM.PSU.EDU> comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU newsgroups: bit.listserv.physhare