Re: floating objects

Article View: bit.listserv.physhare

Article #997

Back to bit.listserv.physhare Previous Next

#997

From: Nevin M. Ranck H 215 767-0762
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 03:35

3 lines
893 bytes

LUDVIK: in regards to the floating objects I would say I agree with the
statement.  I understand your position but suspect it is really a
question of semantics.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <PHYSHARE%94112222374307@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PSUVM.PSU.EDU!NXR3

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 16cfd8,92871f92b362be55,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid16cfd8,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-23 04:34:36 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PSUVM.PSU.EDU!NXR3
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.physhare
Message-ID: <PHYSHARE%94112222374307@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 22:35:00 EST
Sender: Sharing resources for high school physics <PHYSHARE@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
From: "Nevin M. Ranck H 215 767-0762" <NXR3@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
Subject: Re: floating objects
In-Reply-To: KOWALSKI AT APOLLO.MONTCLAIR.EDU -- Fri, 18 Nov 1994 13:35:00 EST
Lines: 2