Thread View: bit.listserv.physhare
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by John Mallinckrodt
Fri, 24 Feb 1995 15:29
Re: mass as a verb
Author: John Mallinckrodt
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 1995 15:29
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 1995 15:29
25 lines
1651 bytes
1651 bytes
Cherie "sunglasses" Lehman writes: >... John ... said: > >>Yes, inertial balances calibrated in mass units work just as well >>on the earth as on the moon. But notice that they depend on >>"gravitational forces" to work in both places. >> ... >John, >As some others have pointed out, an inertial balance uses elastic >forces and SHM to measure inertial mass and does not require a >gravitational field or a simulation of same. Of course, you are right. I guess I used the term "inertial balance" incorrectly. What I had in mind was the standard lab- type balance beam to which earlier discussion had referred. But why should the kind of device you are talking about be called a "balance"? What's being balanced? I think I'll call it an "inertial bounce." John Mallinckrodt Cal Poly Pomona ajmallinckro@csupomona.edu
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads