Thread View: bit.listserv.physhare
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Steve Luzader
Wed, 22 Feb 1995 18:03
Re: mass vs. weight
Author: Steve Luzader
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 18:03
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 18:03
19 lines
1709 bytes
1709 bytes
Strictly speaking, most of the instruments we use for measuring "mass" are actually measuring weight. When you step on a bathroom scale, you stretch a spring because of your weight. When you determine the mass of something on a balance, you're comparing the torque produced by the weight of the object with the torque produced by another weight that has been calibrated in some fashion. So in that sense, we are always "weighing" things, rather than "massing" them. Our balances happen to be calibrated in units of mass, but they are actually measuring weight. There used to be an old experiment we did that actually measured mass by determining the period of vibration of an object as it rode on a platform attached to some springs. This device would work even in the far reaches of outer space, where the net gravitational force on objects is negligible. Try using a double pan balance in space! To study body mass changes during orbital flight, astronauts actually use a spring-mounted chair to measure their masses. Steve Luzader sluzader@fre.fsu.umd.edu
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads