Article View: bit.listserv.psycgrad
Article #2181Alcoholism discussion
From: Chris Penta
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 00:00
36 lines
2849 bytes
2849 bytes
I have been following the interesting discussion about biological predisposition toward alcohol dependence, research, and treatment. I am a doctoral student at Antioch New England. I have also been a therapist, clinical instructor, and researcher at the Alcohol Research Center at the UCONN School of Medicine for the last seven years. Some quick comments: (1) It is becoming clear from double-blind placebo controlled research that naltrexone (an opioid blocker) may be as effective with alcohol dependence as antidepressants are for depression. Intervening with the endogenous opioid pathway is a promising area for addiction (and maybe someday for parasuicidal behavior). Medications don't work independent of well-delivered psychosocial treatment. It seems that something is different about the brains of addicts. We can't say if that is a cause or effect. There is one group for whom there seems to be a biological marker that can be identified even in kids (before the first drink). The P3 wave (EEG) marker has been shown only in males (so far). (2) I really don't think anyone involved with this discussion is being flip about safety. I am not being critical, honest. Please be very careful recommending controlled drinking for clients with addiction. There seems to be some evidence that people with addiction histories can sometimes drink without totally undoing their lives. IMHO, there is a ton of evidence that alcohol kills these people. Seeing someone who has not curtailed their drinking die in the hospital is a highly instructive experience. I recommend doing this before recommending drinking to anyone. I am currently involved in a study that puts the client in control of their goal (abstinence vs. low levels of drinking) and even their medication (naltrexone). We do NOT do this with alcohol dependent clients! Only with people who have signs of developing a problem (one or two psychosocial criteria). Even with these people, we are very clear that it's safest not to drink. While I share the concern that researchers can be biased against controlled drinking, I don't want to look someone in the eye and make the recommendation that ends up killing him/her. I look forward to the further comments of others. Chris Penta penta@snet.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<344E28B2.7B30@snet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<9710220401.AA22598@mercury.cc.uottawa.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11317e,b8d5fcf7064d9a59,start X-Google-Attributes: gid11317e,public From: Chris Penta <penta@SNET.NET> Subject: Alcoholism discussion Date: 1997/10/22 Message-ID: <344E28B2.7B30@snet.net> X-Deja-AN: 282485550 Sender: Psychology Graduate Students Discussion Group List <PSYCGRAD@LISTSERV.UOTTAWA.CA> References: <9710220401.AA22598@mercury.cc.uottawa.ca> Comments: ******************************************************** Reply-To: penta@snet.net Newsgroups: bit.listserv.psycgrad