Thread View: bit.listserv.psycgrad
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Kimberly Stanley
Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:00
On behalf of Brad Jesness
Author: Kimberly Stanley
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:00
72 lines
3719 bytes
3719 bytes
Kim Stanley posting this on behalf of Brad Jesness: A new sort of index to good psychology sites has emerged: the META-INDEX. These indexes list (and provide hot buttons to) only the following: to the very best "comprehensive" indexes (on other sites) related to their area of focus *AND* they list uniquely good psychology sites (in their area of focus) as well. There are now 2 meta-indexes in clinical psychology and psychiatry (Note: the meta-indexes do tend to stay focused, with sites *for a particular profession*, so they do their job of being both truely good and truely thorough VERY WELL). These are the 2 major META indexes today:: http://www.future.net/~bradj/father.html AND (from another organization): http://www.diagnostics.org/meta.html -------- My other Web Site: http://www.future.net/~bradj/it.html A paper on this web site offers a critique of the counseling/psychotherapy field and describes solutions. Along with it you will find another major paper (on an ethological conceptualization of learning) and an algorithm for scoring your own assessment inventories !! Let me provide a little more information about the these resources of interest to many people: The first-mentioned work is a fairly long paper that offers a very pointed clear, well-reasoned, well-based critique of the counseling/psychotherapy field as it is today, etc. And it also outlines the nature of the SOLUTIONS to the major problems. This paper has been read in-full and given enthusiastic positive reviews by major clinical and counseling professors, including Allen Ivey, Alvin Mahrer, and Robyn Dawes. It has been considered an important paper by Paul Barrett of the U.K. (in his view, indicating important topics of needed research). It has been considered worthy of discussion in professional circles by Carroll Izard and Paul Meehl. Re: Computer Inventory Scoring Algorithm, on this web site (a program to fully score personality inventories ONESELF): A quote from a satisfied user: "... The program performs well and appears to be accurate. It is a no frills straightforward scoring program that will allow you to calculate the raw scores as well as the T-scores. Written in Basic the program is easy to use and to modify to other psychometric instruments. The program will score forced choice T-F and Multiple choice instruments. The accompanying instructions ( If followed faithfully) are very clear and easy to follow. Through the kindness of Mr. Jesness the program is in the public domain. It is available through his web site. " (end quote) This program can be used to score ANY forced choice inventory, even ones with 100 + scales. The paper outlining an ethological conceptualization of learning may be very relevant to those interested in learning theory. It looks at learning from the standpoint of the findings on memory and principles of cognitve development. It also describes learning in terms of the development of interrelated basic capacities. Regards, Brad Jesness, M.A. active spokesperson of Client Advocates
Re: On behalf of Brad Jesness
Author: Daniel L Snyder
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:00
33 lines
2083 bytes
2083 bytes
>Kim Stanley posting this on behalf of Brad Jesness: If Mr. Jesness wishes to contribute to this list, then perhaps Mr. Jesness should get accepted into a graduate psychology program and then join this list. I believe these are the requirements for participation. As it stands, Mr. Jesness has had, and continues to have, opportunity to express his negativity against the field of Clinical Psychology via Usenet. In addition, he been on at least one other list until such time as he subsequently lost that priviledges due to the same negativity. While it is certainly kind of Mr. Jesness to point us toward the Meta indices, I question whether persons on this list have the kind of self-loathing necessary to read his "critique". It would be simpler to just read usenet (try sci.psychology.psychotherapy) in order to experience Brad spew his venom. I, for one, do not like to be called names, nor do I wish to have my intelligence or my morals questioned. Thus I would consider it a personal favor if you would keep Mr. Jesness out of this list. Let him go peddle his fish elsewhere. Thanks. -Dan ______________________________________________________ Husband, Father, Licensed Psychologist, Doctoral Student . . . Tired ----------------Promise Keeper, by the Grace of God--------------- Center for Christian Psychological Services, P.A. 2233 Hamline Avenue North, Suite 435 St. Paul, MN 55113 office 612.633.5290 pager 612.613.0940
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads