Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #248Re: quality projects/G'house
From: L. H. Garlinghouse
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00
42 lines
2549 bytes
2549 bytes
On 10 Sep 1998 Glen Gee asks: > As a general question, does anyone have comments on the best way or > method to get results from quality improvement projects? ====================== Yes: 1.) The method of running, reporting and implementing the QIP should be structured. This means that if a team approach is to be used, it must be given legitimacy by the appropriate level of management. This implies that the boundries (what can be done/what cannot; the resources available and not available, etc) are set from the beginning. There should be published procedings of each meeting or at least published progress reports on some regular basis. Management must acknowledge the reports and pay attention to what is happening. 2.) The appropriate problem solving tools should be used. If the people (including management) are not familiar with these tools, then some training is in order. (It is amazing how much can be accomplished with very simple tools). Management should be familiar enough with said tools that they can spot misuse as well as their appropriate use, or suggest the appropriate tool. Finally, management must really care about the problem being solved and be disposed to commit the resources to solve same, once the team or whatever discovers the root causes and solutions. Juran has quite a lot to say on this (as one might expect). His model of the "diagnostic journey" followed by the "remedial journey" is worthwhile re-reading from time to time. Hope this is helpful. << All opinions, statements, &c are my own>> L.H. Garlinghouse, C.Q.E. Pocahontas AR U.S.A. (870) 892-4586 ext 7659 garlinghou@waterlooindustries.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5FDFD812BA@poca.waterlooindustries.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<16F74885514@waterlooindustries.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1159be,709f88961a77ef86,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public From: "L. H. Garlinghouse" <garlinghou@waterlooindustries.com> Subject: Re: quality projects/G'house Date: 1998/09/14 Message-ID: <5FDFD812BA@poca.waterlooindustries.com> X-Deja-AN: 391081309 Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * References: <16F74885514@waterlooindustries.com> Priority: normal Comments: ******************************************************** Approved-By: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@QUALITY.ORG> X-Received: from SpoolDir by WI-POCA (Mercury 1.30); 11 Sep 98 15:33:17 -0600 Organization: Waterloo Industries, Inc. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality