🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #25

Re: Inspection and test status (fwd)

#25
From: Bill Casti (System Admin)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 00:00
32 lines
2220 bytes
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 07:38:10 -0700
From: "R. Ramamurthy" <rram@mailcity.com>
To: quality@PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: Inspection and test status


>> >I  have  the  problem  with Inspection and test status. Our product include
 automation  systems used in power generation industry and it is not obvious how
   to  establish  and  implement  the  inspection and test status. To the comput
 er  system  we  can  not stick the status card.  Naturally we test our products
   in  many  ways  and we have a lot of measurements, but in fact, I feel,  this
   is not enough.
>>
 IMHO you are raising basically two points.

One: How to show the Status regarding Computersied automation systems.
Without knowing your systems in detail, what I think can be done is that
the automation system in use can be programmed in such a way that the top
or bottom of the programme itself can generate a line saying what the
inspection status at that point of time is - to say whether the required
inspection and test has been done at that particular point as required
under the qulaity plan.

Two: Showing the status on products that are tested: This can of course
follow the system of labelling, tags, indicating by placards or storage
in suitably marked areas. These will indicate wheter the product is
awaiting inspection, or tested and passed or tested and failed.

Ram
Bangalore, India
email: rram@mailcity.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980929200642.4587B-100000@cyberq.quality.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1159be,3c3186128856284a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public
From: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@quality.org>
Subject: Re: Inspection and test status (fwd)
Date: 1998/09/29
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980929200642.4587B-100000@cyberq.quality.org>
X-Deja-AN: 396174313
Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu>
Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU                              *
Comments: ********************************************************
Approved-By: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@QUALITY.ORG>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality