Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #281Re: Pre Control Charts/G'house
From: FIsackson
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 00:00
57 lines
3488 bytes
3488 bytes
L. H. Garlinghouse wrote of his concern that Juran's Quality Handbook now pays obeisance to Shainin's PRE Control Charts and inquired as to my reasons for seeking their interment. They are several but as one of mine--the first--is the lack of peer review, I shall avoid most charges of hypocrisy by citing the article by Ledolter and Swerson, "An Evaluation Pre-Control" in the Journal of Quality Technology 29, 2, 1997. Legend # confirmed by this writer * Ledolter and Swerson 1) #* Shainin, et. al. consider the technique as proprietary or intellectual property and thus purportedly free of the obligation to undergo peer review 2) * A series of simulations on normal, normal contaminated and exponential distributed variates showed the error rate for false signals, missed signals and ARL to be substantially higher than competing methodologies, Shewhart and CUSUM to be precise. 3) # Calculation of the ARLs for various processes shows the procedure to be inferior to Shewhart Charts (sample size = 2) 4) # * The presentation of the method (in print) assumes the implementation of the method operates in an intellectual vacuum, i.e no other methods of analysis or training are at hand. 4) * The technique is particularly feeble when dealing with low capability processes. 5) #* Owing to it's lack of a statistical representation, one cannot distinguish common from special causes. 6) * it provides no useful pedagogical path for using ever more powerful techniques of process control. 7) * It is a univariate technique only. (This is a superficial restatement of Ledolter and Swerson's article which is written at a level suitable for almost anyone with any training in the mathematical foundations of SPC.) Garlinghouse has interpreted my remarks as suggesting the technique is used frequently. I have no independent knowledge of this (Ledolter and Swerson apparently do.) I've been asked about the technique on numerous occasions but by would-be clients who were well-enough informed to both ask about it and be concerned about the educational level of their employees. Garlinghouse also refers to these charts as "rainbow charts." I freely recommend to all who are engaged in the establishment of SPC (and who use computers) to use the colored bar technique in the training and early implementation stages. This does work well. Finally--and probably unnecessary--I must doff my figurative hat to Dorian Shainin and his progeny whose contributions to the practice of Quality Control are significant. Their legacy over the last 50 years is substantially greater than that of but a handful of others. Their jewels of achievements just do not need this bit of paste. Frank Isackson re:SOLUTIONS FIsackson@aol.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<970827180803_-1234408960@emout17.mail.aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1159be,dee5d59a647f0321 X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public From: FIsackson@aol.com Subject: Re: Pre Control Charts/G'house Date: 1997/08/27 Message-ID: <970827180803_-1234408960@emout17.mail.aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 269954924 Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Comments: ******************************************************** Approved-By: "Bill Casti, CQA (System Administrator)" <help@QUALITY.ORG> X-Received: (from root@localhost) by emout25.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id SAA04414; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 18:15:50 -0400 (EDT) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality