Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #83Supplier metrics
From: Daniel J O'Leary
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00
27 lines
1725 bytes
1725 bytes
We are changing our supplier management system as
part of our implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning.
The software allows us to evaluate suppliers by both
objective and subjective measures. In addition, we
can weight these measures to arrive at a top level
evaluation
Imagine a tree that looks like this (indents matter).
Overall
Objective Weight
Obj Crit. #1 Weight
Obj Crit #2 Weight
Obj Crit #3 Weight
Subjective Weight
Sub Crit #1 Weight
Sub Crit #2 Weight
Sub Crit #3 Weight
If you had three objective criteria and three subjective criteria (the
system doesn't limit us to that) what would you use and how would you
weight them?
Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE, CQM, CRE
Business Process Executive for Manufacturing
doleary@qbe.picker.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8525665D.0074DE60.00@ntssmtp.picker.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1159be,952d706f7edbdfd7,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public From: "Daniel J O'Leary" <doleary@ntssmtp.picker.com> Subject: Supplier metrics Date: 1998/08/12 Message-ID: <8525665D.0074DE60.00@ntssmtp.picker.com> X-Deja-AN: 380369136 Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * Comments: ******************************************************** Approved-By: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@QUALITY.ORG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Received: by ntssmtp.picker.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.1 (569.2 2-6-1998)) id 8525665D.0075D009 ; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 17:26:49 -0400 X-Lotus-FromDomain: PICKER Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality Content-Disposition: inline