Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #97Subjective Satisfaction - Was Re: Supplier metrics
From: MonteMors
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00
15 lines
1421 bytes
1421 bytes
In a message dated 98-08-17 09:09:09 EDT, doleary@ntssmtp.picker.com writes:
> Conclusion: If we dislike subjective responses to our customer satisfaction
> survey,
> then we should also dislike subjective responses on our supplier survey.
Dan, and those who agree with the above:
Question: Do you in fact "dislike subjective responses to your customer
satisfaction survey," and if so why?
Sub-question: What is your theory of customer decision-making for future
purchases?
Steve Morstad MonteMors@aol.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<77c9c938.35d84e13@aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1159be,c08d2e58886ea5c9,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public From: MonteMors@aol.com Subject: Subjective Satisfaction - Was Re: Supplier metrics Date: 1998/08/17 Message-ID: <77c9c938.35d84e13@aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 382030947 Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * Comments: ******************************************************** Approved-By: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@QUALITY.ORG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Received: from MonteMors@aol.com by imo30.mx.aol.com (IMOv14_b1.1) id DOKUa12042 for <quality@pucc.princeton.edu>; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 11:36:50 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality