Article View: bit.listserv.rhetoric
Article #514Re: fountain pens
From: Thomas
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1992 19:43
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1992 19:43
4 lines
942 bytes
942 bytes
Maybe revision is easier with new technology, but so is yielding to the temptation to over-write. Word processors have given a powerful weapon to those who equate verbosity with intellectualism. Wasn't brevity supposed to be the soul of something . . .?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<RHETORIC%92011314510415@VM.ECS.RPI.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!HARVARDA.BITNET!UDOTPLShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1498c9,e3048014bb32664d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1498c9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-13 12:02:41 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!HARVARDA.BITNET!UDOTPL
Message-ID: <RHETORIC%92011314510415@VM.ECS.RPI.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rhetoric
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1992 14:43:19 EST
Sender: "Rhetoric, social movements, persuasion" <RHETORIC@RPIECS.BITNET>
From: Thomas <UDOTPL@HARVARDA.BITNET>
Subject: Re: fountain pens
In-Reply-To: Message of Mon,
13 Jan 1992 11:20:41 CST from <rwahlstr@HP.UWSUPER.EDU>