Re: e-mail

Article View: bit.listserv.rhetoric

Article #522

Back to bit.listserv.rhetoric Previous Next

#522

From: Charles Stanford
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1992 04:00

10 lines
1322 bytes

Charlie:
        I think of e-mail as more personal than hard-copy mail.  The
reasons have been given.  I think another reason is the ease of response.
No looking for stamps, envelopes, paper, and a pen.
       I have also noticed that different pens tend to color the type of
writing I do.  fountain pens are my favorite (I found Esterbrook the
best, what which their interchangable points), but I do tend to be more
conservative with a fountain pen.

Charles

Technical Details

Message-ID: <RHETORIC%92011323071398@VM.ECS.RPI.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UMCVMB.MISSOURI.EDU!C551534

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1498c9,d4fd56af2685faf5
X-Google-Attributes: gid1498c9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-13 20:17:24 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UMCVMB.MISSOURI.EDU!C551534
Message-ID: <RHETORIC%92011323071398@VM.ECS.RPI.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rhetoric
Date:         Mon, 13 Jan 1992 22:00:57 CST
Sender:       "Rhetoric, social movements, persuasion" <RHETORIC@RPIECS.BITNET>
From:         Charles Stanford <C551534@UMCVMB.MISSOURI.EDU>
Subject:      Re: e-mail
X-To:         "Rhetoric, social movements,
              persuasion" <RHETORIC%RPIECS.bitnet@VM.ITS.RPI.EDU>
In-Reply-To:  Message of Mon,
              13 Jan 1992 20:41:20 -0500 from
              <ch2i+%ANDREW.CMU.EDU%CARNEGIE.bitnet@VM.ITS.RPI.EDU>