Article View: bit.listserv.rhetoric
Article #561Re: Student/Teacher evaluations
From: BURNS
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1992 14:50
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1992 14:50
18 lines
1710 bytes
1710 bytes
As a postscript to the conversation recently. I find that the use of the information accumulated from student evaluation is where most abuse can occur. As one writer pointed out the method of analyzing the data is crucial. While I am not an empirical type, I know that statistics are often ambiguous. But I also know that the results can be manipulated by someone familiar with the methods. The instructor can collect, analyze and present the data in what ever fashion they want. They include a list of "representative" (read select) student comments and that material is submitted for review and other purposes. In this situation I don't think that they are useful or particularly reliable or relevant. However, if the instructor uses the information for his/her own benefit, to find areas of weakness and improve then student evaluation can be useful. Student evaluations can be an important source of information for the instructor on topics that the students are able to assess. Evaluations are only useless if not approached honestly. Kelly Burns
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<RHETORIC%92021210565035@VM.ECS.RPI.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!IPFWCVAX.BITNET!BURNSShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1498c9,8b500679dd8bc68f X-Google-Attributes: gid1498c9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-12 08:08:28 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!IPFWCVAX.BITNET!BURNS Original_To: BITNET%"RHETORIC@RPIECS.BITNET" Message-ID: <RHETORIC%92021210565035@VM.ECS.RPI.EDU> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rhetoric Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1992 09:50:00 EST Sender: "Rhetoric, social movements, persuasion" <RHETORIC@RPIECS.BITNET> From: BURNS@IPFWCVAX.BITNET Subject: Re: Student/Teacher evaluations