Article View: bit.listserv.screen-l
Article #158Re: Translating Private Ryan
From: Jim Marsden
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00
18 lines
1411 bytes
1411 bytes
I suppose that a thoroughgoing pacifist could fault SPR for being "pro-war" because it does not promote turning the other cheek. But unless one is prepared to claim that even in the face of Nazi aggression there should have been no military response, it is hard to imagine any convincing grounds for calling "pro-war" a film that so devastatingly portrays the horror of battle. Jim Marsden/Bryant College > You're right, Bob. SPR was a masterpiece that no one could reasonably > deem to be pro-war. Anyone's reasons for thinking otherwise will be > amusing. > > - Josh ---- Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite http://www.tcf.ua.edu/screensite
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.SGI.3.96.980915142751.3427F-100000@bryant1-ha>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<35FD7DEF.319299D5@ibm.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1056ca,43a16fd77342b6b8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1056ca,public From: Jim Marsden <jmarsden@BRYANT.EDU> Subject: Re: Translating Private Ryan Date: 1998/09/15 Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.96.980915142751.3427F-100000@bryant1-ha> X-Deja-AN: 391852062 Sender: Film and TV Studies Discussion List <SCREEN-L@UA1VM.UA.EDU> Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * References: <35FD7DEF.319299D5@ibm.net> X-Sender: jmarsden@bryant1-ha Comments: ******************************************************** Approved-By: CHU001@BAMA.UA.EDU Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.screen-l