Re: Re[2]: CIM problems

Article View: bit.listserv.simula

Article #390

Back to bit.listserv.simula Previous Next

#390

From: Rob Pooley
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 00:00

24 lines
984 bytes

I wonder if the use of comments following ends is causing some confusion. In
general the error reports are consistent with loss of scope information at the
beginning or end of preocedures.

Does it work if you replace things like


end; !**of**proc1;

with the equally valid

end**of**proc1;

Rob Pooley
Department of Computer Science
Edinburgh University
Kings Buildings
Mayfield
Edinburgh      EH9 3JZ
Scotland

Tel. +44 131 650 5123

Fax. +44 131 667 7209

Technical Details

Message-ID: <22446.9507111150@auskerry.dcs.ed.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <9506068050.AA805049422@cc2smtp.tdata.no>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 113dd9,9a80dad1ddc220e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid113dd9,public
From: Rob Pooley <rjp@DCS.ED.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: CIM problems
Date: 1995/07/11
Message-ID: <22446.9507111150@auskerry.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 106050280
sender: The SIMULA Language List <SIMULA@uga.cc.uga.edu>
references: <9506068050.AA805049422@cc2smtp.tdata.no>
comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
content-length: 459
newsgroups: bit.listserv.simula

Reply to Parent Message