Re: Re[2]: CIM problems

Article View: bit.listserv.simula

Article #393

Back to bit.listserv.simula Previous Next

#393

From: Ron Kerr
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 00:00

19 lines
1055 bytes

Rob Pooley writes:
>
> I wonder if the use of comments following ends is causing some confusion. In
> general the error reports are consistent with loss of scope information at the
> beginning or end of preocedures.
>
> Does it work if you replace things like
>
>
> end; !**of**proc1;
>
> with the equally valid
>
> end**of**proc1;

 I wondered about that too and checked it out. The version of cim we
 have here had no trouble with that.

 Cheers....Ron

Technical Details

Message-ID: <199507131358.OAA07170@aidan.ncl.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 113dd9,9a80dad1ddc220e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid113dd9,public
From: Ron Kerr <R.Kerr@NEWCASTLE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: CIM problems
Date: 1995/07/13
Message-ID: <199507131358.OAA07170@aidan.ncl.ac.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 106260187
sender: The SIMULA Language List <SIMULA@uga.cc.uga.edu>
comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
content-length: 461
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: bit.listserv.simula
x-mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
              11, 95 12: 50:27 pm