Article View: bit.listserv.skywarn
Article #1582RTTY, Packet, SKYWARN, etc.
From: Sam Barricklow
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:00
232 lines
10774 bytes
10774 bytes
Comments on Packet, RTTY, SKYWARN and Related Topics ------------------------------------------------------------ The amateur radio packet system is fantastic for relaying reports that are not time-critical. Packet, RTTY, AMTOR, PACTOR or any other digital mode is not acceptable for communicating time critical information, such as spotter reports or warnings. RTTY is old technology. RTTY may be considered cheap, but it would be a shame to duplicate a RTTY alerting system system, especially if equipment must be purchased. (Packet TNCs are inexpensive, common and work much better.) The most serious problem with a RTTY system is that once the transmission is completed and you missed it for some reason, the information is lost. And, there is no good way to automatically relay messages to areas beyond that covered by the transmitter. Packet, AMTOR and PACTOR modes on the other hand use error correcting protocols and in the case of packet, store and forward techniques to ensure that messages may be transmitted and relayed accurately to distant stations without error. Information that could be relayed through packet include damage reports/survey results, official communication where accuracy is essential (but time is not), weather watches, weather advisories and training bulletins. Voice networks are the best and fastest way to relay spotter reports to NWS and public safety officials and in return weather information to spotters. And, the public can monitor the exchanges without the need for special equipment other than a scanner. Packet Networks - TEXNET ---------------------------- There is an amateur radio packet network in Texas called TEXNET. It is funded and supported primarily by amateur radio operators. TEXNET is run by the Texas Packet Radio Society (TPRS), which is a registered non-profit organization. The TEXNET system includes two bulletin boards, one for messages between hams and one for weather forecasts, conditions and bulletins. It may also be used like a huge digipeater to make connections to other stations who could be located hundreds of miles away on the other side of the state. During unsettled weather, I check into the TEXNET weather bulletin board to read the convective outlook and to check hourly surface observations. During severe weather events, weather warnings are posted, but it is much faster to get warnings via NOAA Weather Radio. If you miss the warning or you want to read the exact text, it is on the bulletin board waiting for you to read ! For more information on packet radio and the TEXNET system, write to: TPRS P.O. Box 50238 Denton, TX 75206-0238 Mobile Packet? ---------------- I have considered mobile packet several times over the years, but have never found adequate justification for the expense and effort. Packet is too cumbersome to use mobile, too expensive and would rarely offer any benefit over voice communication. Maybe later. Voice Networks ---------------- There are networks through which voice communications are relayed over large geographic areas. The biggest in Texas is called the "West Texas Connection" (WTC). The WTC is used for SKYWARN and allows NWS offices in Midland, Lubbock and Amarillo to effectively service large areas. Networks of this type are fairly common across the western half of the U.S., especially in the inter-mountain region where population densities are relatively low. The West Texas Connection uses 220 and 440 MHz relay stations to connect between local area 144 MHz (2 meter) repeaters. It is a dynamic system and may not be fully active at any one time. Control operators are responsible for establishing connections. I believe that the Texas VHF FM Society is involved in this effort. Unfortunately, I don't have their address. If anyone is interested, let me know and I will post their address. SKYWARN Net Operation ------------------------- Several comments have been made concerning the type of reports that should be allowed on a net. The NWS Spotter's Field Guide lists the "minimum reporting criteria". This criteria is sufficient in most cases. However, the net control should be encouraged to specify the type of report that is needed and when possible, direct inquiries to specific spotters who are known to be in a good location to make the desired observation. The most successful nets have fairly lax discipline until events require stringent control. When continuous and severe net discipline is attempted, nets often suffer from either lack of activity or outright malicious interference from disgruntled individuals. (I assume that the "disgruntled" interferers were at one time scolded by net control and the interference is a sort of retribution for the public embarrassment.) SKYWARN operators must be thoroughly trained on proper net operation and procedure at times other than during real events. Most amateur radio SKYWARN nets use net control stations (NCS) who are not located at the NWS. These net control stations are concerned with maintaining the required level of net discipline and extracting as much relevant information from spotters as possible. It is a tough job and requires a respected operator who can maintain discipline and who also has good knowledge of storm structure. The NCS should also function as a spotter from time to time in order to maintain an understanding of both ends of the operation. Knowledge of storm structure and spotting allows the NCS to direct the spotter's attention to the most dangerous part of the storm. In the Dallas/Fort Worth area, net control is a team effort. It is common for NCS operators use two radios, one for communicating with the net and a second for communicating with the team. Supporting operators may assist by locating mobile stations on a grided map, helping to keep track of multiple storms or other tasks the NCS may need help with. A group of volunteer amateur radio operators are also stationed at the Fort Worth National Weather Service Forecast Office (FTW NWSFO). Their collective responsibility is to extract important information from the various SKYWARN nets within the FTW NWSFO area of responsibility and then relay that info to the NWS meteorologists. They also log reports for future reference and they relay radar information to the spotters directly from the NWS radar operator who sits only a few feet away. Up to six amateur radio stations are manned by individual operators at the FTW NWSFO during severe weather events. In addition, area communities who have established Emergency Operating Centers (EOC) have amateur radio stations that are manned during nets. The responsibility of the EOC operator is to relay information to city officials who then decide when to sound warning sirens or act on other public safety issues reported through the net. By monitoring the net, the city official does not have to wait for a warning to be issued via the weather radio, via the weather wire or by some other slower means. Public officials receive real time reports on which to base their important and sometimes life-saving decisions. TRAINING ----------- I am a member of the Garland Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service (RACES). Garland RACES can provide emergency communications for city officials during almost any emergency situation. However, SKYWARN is our primary activity. Garland RACES cooperates fully with Dallas County RACES and with other RACES and ARES organizations in the area. A county-wide RACES Council was formed years ago. The Council is made up of of representatives from all RACES organizations in the county. The Council handles various issues ranging from net protocols to picnics. Garland RACES has membership requirements that must be satisfied each year. Members must attend an NWS SKYWARN training session, check into a minimum of 18 on-the-air training nets, and contribute at least four hours to "event training", such as a marathon, parade or some other activity. The on the air training covers various topics including spotting, net discipline, first aid, chemical spills, damage assessment equipment maintenance, radio direction finding, general operating habits and how to respond to various emergency situations. Amateur Radio Television (ATV) and Weather Radar ------------------------------------------------------- ATV is the best mode for transmitting radar imagery to spotters. Many cable ready TV sets can receive ATV signals, provided the signal is strong and a good antenna is used with low loss feed line. Be aware that TV sets are not very sensitive. Better results can be achieved with an ATV convertor. Convertors can be purchased for about $60. Obtaining a radar feed can be a challenge. Often, a local T.V. station or cable provider will allow Hams access to their radar system as a public service. Access to WSR-88D imagery can be difficult because of restrictive agreements between the government and companies who have contracts to sell this tax payer financed "product". ATV transmitting equipment requires operators with good technical expertise, funds to purchase and maintain the equipment and a tall tower, high hill or mountain on which to place the transmitter and antenna. My mobile ATV setup consists of a small portable AC/DC color TV, a $60 ATV downconverter that converts the ATV signal to TV channel 3 and a 440 MHz magnetic-mount co-linear vertical antenna. These items are available from Ham Radio dealers all over the U.S., such as Texas Towers, 214-422-7306 in Plano, Texas or Tucker Electronics, 214-388-8800 in Garland, Texas. Summary ---------- This may be a bit overwhelming for a SKYWARN group in a small community to handle. If so, you may want to expand your organization to a county or a larger area if required. If you're worried about politics, don't. Politics happen, you can't change that. Don't give up, you may have to do a little "politicing" of your own. Stay focused on your objective. Sam Barricklow K5KJ NNNN
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59.53964.99.0C38F0AB@drig.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1048cc,3df4ce7f1ddd85e5,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1048cc,public From: Sam Barricklow <sam.barricklow@DRIG.COM> Subject: RTTY, Packet, SKYWARN, etc. Date: 1996/02/05 Message-ID: <59.53964.99.0C38F0AB@drig.com> X-Deja-AN: 138064904 sender: The SKYWARN list <SKYWARN@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> organization: Dallas Remote Imaging Group telnet bbs.drig.com <info@drig.com> comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU newsgroups: bit.listserv.skywarn