Article View: bit.listserv.skywarn
Article #208SKYWARN Organization
From: Sam Barricklow
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 00:00
52 lines
3186 bytes
3186 bytes
REORGANIZE RACES and SKYWARN? A point was raised during the FEMA Tornado Emergency seminar broadcast this morning on C-SPAN2 that relates directly to the current organization of SKYWARN at the local level. Don Burgess and Joseph Golden both pointed out that spotters are most needed in rural areas. This is because WSR-88D coverage is best near larger cities, where the radars are located. Due to the characteristics of the radar beam, doppler resolution of wind speeds and reflectivity signatures degrades with increased distance from the radar. The probability of detecting a tornado using doppler radar is directly effected by these factors. Currently, most SKYWARN organizations, especially those organized under RACES, are under either county or city control. In many cases, such as with Dallas County RACES, the focus of the group is within the county. Typically, SKYWARN nets are shut down when storm activity moves out of Dallas County into the surrounding rural counties. (There are a few dedicated spotters from Dallas County who will track stronger storms outside of the county.) Since the probability of detecting a tornado using the WSR-88D is lower outside of the Metroplex (DFW) area and decreases as the distance from the radar site increases, the need for trained SKYWARN spotters is greater in the rural areas where spotter resources are less. (I use the DFW area only as an example and assume that there are other SKYWARN groups that behave in a similar fashion.) As a result of these factors, it is time to consider a basic reorganization of RACES and SKYWARN, changing from a local organization controlled by a city or county government to a regional organization. The governmental focus of responsibility should be either the National Weather Service Forecast Office (NWSFO) with warning responsibility for the location or a state controlled multi-county organization that parallels NWSFO responsibility. In some areas of the country, this regional approach is already practiced. But, in many areas it is not. A standard approach is needed. Comments? Sam Barricklow K5KJ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from SKYWARN send e-mail to LISTSERV@PO.UIUC.EDU with "unsub skywarn" in the body of your message. If you need help or more information on the SKYWARN discussion group write to chris@siu.edu or see http://www.inlink.com/~landmb/intro.html. For more information on SKYWARN activities across the country visit http://www.skywarn.com and http://www.winternet.com/~daveej.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<35DC165B.654552F@pulse.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1048cc,51b8be9d2f0522a4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1048cc,public From: Sam Barricklow <k5kj@PULSE.NET> Subject: SKYWARN Organization Date: 1998/08/20 Message-ID: <35DC165B.654552F@pulse.net> X-Deja-AN: 384323266 Sender: The SKYWARN list <SKYWARN@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: SKYWARN MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: k5kj@pulse.net Newsgroups: bit.listserv.skywarn