Article View: bit.listserv.skywarn
Article #250Re: SKYWARN Digest - 30 Apr 1998 to 1 May 1998
From: Don or Darla Arnold
Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 00:00
63 lines
3656 bytes
3656 bytes
*********************************************************************** > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 08:55:09 -0500 > From: Chuck Doswell <doswell@NSSL.NOAA.GOV> > Subject: Re: Skywarn in an ignorant community > > In article <6i4ceu$3km$1@supernews.com>, rjhstorm@proaxis.com (rjhstorm) wrote: > > > I dialed 911, only to have the operator tell me that "The National Weather > > Service will notify us if there is any problems". This with a funnel hanging > > over a local community. > > > > Last week, I, as a Skywarn spotter and with my vid cam going - watched a > > thunderstorm complex move up the Willamette Valley. After reporting directly > > to the NWS, I called the local 911 to let them know that thunderstorms with > > frequent cloud to ground lightning were moving within the local urban area. > > Again, and I swear it sounded like the same 911 operator, the response > was less > > than enthusiastic. > > > > I will continue to call 911 - and if their indifference results in untimely > > response to hazardous conditions - then they need to reevaluate their > > proceedures. > > Recently, I had the chance to view some home video of tornadoes in Wyoming > ... in the video, the woman operating the camera mentioned that she had > called 911 and apparently was treated like a crank caller. She was pretty > angry about the way she was treated. It turned out that ANOTHER tornado > passed in view of her house about a year later (amazing how folks who > DON'T want to see tornadoes get "lucky"), and she was still griping about > the uselessness of calling 911 to report tornadoes. > > I think it's appropriate for whoever runs the 911 "system" to re-evaluate > how they treat tornado reports. For many folks, this is their only avenue > for reporting an event and perhaps some procedures need to be set out and > the 911 operators trained in how to take and use tornado reports from > citizens. Either that or we make it clear that 911 is NOT to be used for > such purposes. When we first started our Skywarn group we as the NWS traininer who we should report to...HE replied to the NWS only UNLESS and only UNLESS the tornado was going to go into a civilized area in the next immediate coupole of minutes., repeat TORNADO not funnel cloud. otherwise all reports should go to nws.. CONCUR 100% DON The Southern Mississippi SKYWARN Group +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from SKYWARN send e-mail to LISTSERV@PO.UIUC.EDU with "unsub skywarn" in the body of your message. If you need help or more information on the SKYWARN discussion group write to chris@siu.edu or see http://www.inlink.com/~landmb/intro.html. For more information on SKYWARN activities across the country visit http://www.skywarn.com and http://www.winternet.com/~daveej.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<354AEB03.7A57@datasync.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<199805020500.AAA37852@postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1048cc,12825b4e1906ad72,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1048cc,public From: Don or Darla Arnold <DArnold@DATASYNC.COM> Subject: Re: SKYWARN Digest - 30 Apr 1998 to 1 May 1998 Date: 1998/05/02 Message-ID: <354AEB03.7A57@datasync.com> X-Deja-AN: 349611588 Sender: The SKYWARN list <SKYWARN@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <199805020500.AAA37852@postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu> Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Don or Darla Arnold <DArnold@DATASYNC.COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: http://www.Geocities.com/Heartland/Valley/6430 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.skywarn