Article View: bit.listserv.skywarn
Article #273Re: SKYWARN Digest - 31 May 1998 to 1 Jun 1998
From: D'Amelio, Stephen M.
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 00:00
68 lines
3501 bytes
3501 bytes
> ---------- > From: Sean Carroll[SMTP:History67@AOL.COM] wrote: > > This being the first chance I have had to post since Sunday nights > Northeast > event, please let me sound off on a couple of notes. > > This storm was mighty wild, especially here in central Massachusets. > While we > all want to let everyone know we are involve Storms like this are not the > time. The local SKYWARN freq. was filled with wasted bandwith. > [snip...] You might be preaching to the choir on this list Sean. But I understand your frustration and I used to get upset too. Unfortunately, there seems little you can do about it. You just need good net control to be able to sift through the garbage. I was monitoring Sunday evening in Bellingham MA. Although I am an assistant Skywarn coordinator for Worcester Cty you probably didn't hear from me on the air. There was simply no reportable criteria in Bellingham. When the front passed, My wx station (Davis) reported a gust to 26mph, and I received .25" of rain in about 15 minutes. I immediately heard a report from my town of 50-60mph winds and rain rate of 2"/hr. I can only assume the report was estimated because the net control operator never asked! This is the only time I got on the air, to refute the report. People get excited, it's going to happen. The only thing we must make sure of is that these reports don't get passed to NWS unless they meet the criteria. And I was unhappy to hear many net control ops Sunday *not* asking if the reports were measured or estimated. As things got hot, a lot of bad reports were passed on. A long while ago I made a suggestion, which apparently fell on deaf ears. When a net is activated, if the net controller takes a pre-emptive roll call (before things get hot) and pins them out on his/her local map, they can then call specific stations in the areas they expect trouble. This lets people key their microphones (something everyone seems to be itching to do in bad wx) and it lets the net have an idea of the spotter base in his/her area. Instead of saying "Is there anyone in the Littleton area?" when the doppler is showing a funnel over the town, why not be able to say "Is N1XXX in Littleton still out there? What are you seeing?" This is on the same idea as the RACES call up for their areas. Well, now I'm starting to ramble, see what you did to me :) Steve D'Amelio +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from SKYWARN send e-mail to LISTSERV@PO.UIUC.EDU with "unsub skywarn" in the body of your message. If you need help or more information on the SKYWARN discussion group write to chris@siu.edu or see http://www.inlink.com/~landmb/intro.html. For more information on SKYWARN activities across the country visit http://www.skywarn.com and http://www.winternet.com/~daveej.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DC93526E572CD111ACD000805F1520B3019FF1B2@cvsex001.cvs.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1048cc,19643fe58070e822 X-Google-Attributes: gid1048cc,public From: "D'Amelio, Stephen M." <SMDamelio@CVS.COM> Subject: Re: SKYWARN Digest - 31 May 1998 to 1 Jun 1998 Date: 1998/06/03 Message-ID: <DC93526E572CD111ACD000805F1520B3019FF1B2@cvsex001.cvs.com> X-Deja-AN: 359772935 Sender: The SKYWARN list <SKYWARN@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> Comments: To: "History67@AOL.COM" <History67@AOL.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: "D'Amelio, Stephen M." <SMDamelio@CVS.COM> Content-Type: text/plain Newsgroups: bit.listserv.skywarn