🚀 go-pugleaf

This is becoming ludicrous.  Charles initially misinterpreted The Lians'
position - not surprisingly as he apparently had not read the article.  I
pointed out the difference between his false interpretation and that in the
paper itself.  Then Ania makes the mistake of assuming that my description
of Charles position is in some convoluted way my position.  And then Charles
still not having read the paper say that Ania represents some other position
better than I did which is quite likely because I was not describing that
other position in the first place.  What's it even more ludicrous is that it
is nothing to do with the central criticisms that John and I have made of
the paper which Ania has not yet begun to address .

Is there a stronger word than ludicrous?

Ron Sheen  U of Quebec in Trois Rivieres, Canada.