Article View: bit.listserv.stat-l
Article #3484Collinearity
From: dick darlington
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1992 11:57
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1992 11:57
13 lines
1536 bytes
1536 bytes
Collinearity The recent mention of condition numbers spurs me to amplify my earlier remarks. A covariance matrix might be very ill-conditioned in, say, having its smallest eigenvalue be only 1/10000 times its largest eigenvalue. But if we think of the "predictors" in a regression as divided into "independent variables" and "covariates", and you're mainly interested in estimating the effects of the former on the dependent variable Y, and the collinearity is primarily among the covariates, then you can have acceptably small standard errors where you need them, despite extremely poor conditioning. I suggest emphasizing tolerances over condition numbers; and you look at only those tolerances that are important to you. Conditioning is usually important only if it's so bad that it introduces rounding errors as opposed to sampling errors, and a good regression program should warn you automatically if it's that bad.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<STAT-L%92022512004679@VM1.MCGILL.CA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!QMRELAY.MAIL.CORNELL.EDU!DICK_DARLINGTONShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5efb,e91373ca34f0250b X-Google-Attributes: gidf5efb,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-25 10:06:22 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!QMRELAY.MAIL.CORNELL.EDU!DICK_DARLINGTON Message-ID: <STAT-L%92022512004679@VM1.MCGILL.CA> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.stat-l Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1992 11:57:24 LCL Sender: "STATISTICAL CONSULTING" <STAT-L@MCGILL1.BITNET> From: dick darlington <dick_darlington@QMRELAY.MAIL.CORNELL.EDU> Subject: Collinearity