Article View: bit.listserv.stat-l
Article #3555multiple comparison procedures
From: W. Mark Coward
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1992 00:33
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1992 00:33
12 lines
1114 bytes
1114 bytes
Some people suggest that one is "allowed" k-1 contrasts in a one-way ANOVA with k levels of the factor. They suggest that there is no need to control for multiple comparisons when contrasts are independent and take at most the number of degrees of freedom of the factor. I know that Ryan (1959 or 1960) suggests that this is not appropriate, however I have never encountered a paper that supports this idea. Does anyone know of a reference that lays out the argument in favor of this? Mark Coward
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<STAT-L%92012419445003@VM1.MCGILL.CA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UICVM.BITNET!U56961Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5efb,83fe4d7f6b6ef828,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf5efb,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-25 01:10:48 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UICVM.BITNET!U56961 Message-ID: <STAT-L%92012419445003@VM1.MCGILL.CA> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.stat-l Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1992 18:33:32 CST Sender: "STATISTICAL CONSULTING" <STAT-L@MCGILL1.BITNET> From: "W. Mark Coward" <U56961@UICVM.BITNET> Subject: multiple comparison procedures