Re: multiserial and point multiserial correlation

Article View: bit.listserv.stat-l

Article #3571

Back to bit.listserv.stat-l Previous Next

#3571

From: Stan Jones
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1992 11:41

13 lines
1092 bytes

In <STAT-L%92012719103611@VM1.MCGILL.CA> EDFJHN@GSUVM1.BITNET writes:

>formula persists, but it does.  The biserial and its generalization are
>another matter, definite differences exist.  For example it is possible that
>the biserial correlation can be greater than 1.  A correlation of 5.6 gives
>some a pause.

>john neel
>Department of Educational Foundations
>Georgia State University

A biserial of 5.6 should give someone pause since its maximum value is
1.25.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <sjones.696598910@cunews>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!bonnie.concordia.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!utgpu!cunews!sjones

References: <STAT-L%92012719103611@VM1.MCGILL.CA>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f5efb,f714ecadbdebc279
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5efb,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-28 05:11:11 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!bonnie.concordia.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!utgpu!cunews!sjones
From: sjones@alfred.carleton.ca (Stan Jones)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.stat-l
Subject: Re: multiserial and point multiserial correlation
Message-ID: <sjones.696598910@cunews>
Date: 28 Jan 92 11:41:50 GMT
References: <STAT-L%92012719103611@VM1.MCGILL.CA>
Sender: news@cunews.carleton.ca (John Stewart)
Organization: Carleton University
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message