Viereck? No.......

Article View: bit.listserv.test

Article #145

#145

From: urk.
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 15:30

4 lines
782 bytes

no, not Viereck, this speaks even more ill than Berryman.  Darling.

Alas, one can not influence one's idols, I suppose, so I'll be learning
to support the guided missled reaction tenets to yr hearts content ....

Technical Details

Message-ID: <TEST%92082010363063@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU!CHEATING

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU!CHEATING
Message-ID: <TEST%92082010363063@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.test
Date:         Thu, 20 Aug 1992 15:30:57 GMT
Sender:       TESTing list for NETNEWS <TEST@PSUVM.BITNET>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM
From:         "urk." <cheating@CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU>
Subject:      Viereck? No.......
Comments: To: Multiple recipients of list SBRHYM-L <SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM.BITNET>
Lines: 4