🚀 go-pugleaf

disbelieved]
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 92 18:18:18 GMT
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was H760@ccvm.sunysb.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.test
In-Reply-To: <TEST%92071511405770@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
Organization: Mollusk Infrastructure
Cc:
Bcc:

Parsparilla for the spliced thirsts which one-fell-swoop down the
ails served up for the Plebian Accusatory bLister which DEMANDS to
be fed as well: no jest for the picketed, at least, having to-the-
dogs gone and even then reslapped into woebetides ("but it wasn't
where it wasn't at") and It Could Be Just Like Last One(1) Hot
Summer: i m p e n d i n g <space> t r i p [darling].  All of that
is cancelled as you privy to be are later (oops): your immortattlety
incan'tations have visited damnably upon my cranial damage more than
I could count, even in parentheses.  Rhetorts are best served warm,
and I find the fruit filling is the bestest-parlo(u)r-teariffed-
with-interest (stop gaps, admitted).  If only you'd not infer what
yr Kept Kept Kept Wived does and does not wish to hear ("They were
the Young Armenians (all....night)"), peut-etreble M might not be
so, so ... so-so in the attempts of dismayed-bedding towards the
Spy-in-the-Louse-of-[jellyfish] (don't let them bite!).

A vacancy?  This would bear further explanation, if it was hoped
such would be forthcoming; traged to imperfection, I'm there if
you'd point the way, and if not for (O How you had hoped it would
not yet again arrive at this doorstep, wiping its feet on the
green plastic Welcome mat set out for such a purpose, but, alas,
sadly, the door gets opened anyway) Something having Come a little
ways Up (a different Something! a different way Come! a different
ascendency Up!).  More to try and wholly redeem me in a litigious
syndicative trying to follow.  Damosthenes calls.

HAG: nice new node, the celio overhangs nicely: may I ask what,
in a non-castigative way, do you consider "new literature"?  You
have heard of the 19th century, I might presume?  You have heard
of epistolary, no?  The lackluster Laclos, going back another
century?  25 years falling phenom-like as insufficient bracket:
a meditative wrestling Greco-Roman4302 style (ask the lad about
Cicero) upon the embattled positions of the day: a Sartor Resartus
e-done, revoking the pristine propriety of paper.  I don't
register MTV kaleidoscope cul-de-sacs in just the most recent:
more to the point, as you've already begun writing again (texts
posted as proof, if you need a reminding): are you writing to
fit in? to meet the fad? to make a tidy sum and move on?  The
psychological thrash is still more likely to help you find yr
way to the NYT Book Review, if that's a desirable cottage: just
remember to put it on paper too.

Dana: Looking forward to the book.  Don't forget to give it a
nice sweeping epic feel, and include some polite conversation,
always a hit.

I'm so glad to be an insistance.

M. (Darling ... and then what happened?)