Article View: bit.listserv.test
Article #2693Re: tentative inquiry
From: CHEATING
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1992 19:08
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1992 19:08
134 lines
9025 bytes
9025 bytes
On Wed, 26 Jun 91 13:59:00 GMT, next to of course god america i <MATNIFHLATHU@VAX1.UCG.IE> said: > i've just subscribed to your list, being struck > by the beauty of its name. So far, i've > received some strange material related to severed heads, > and thus, being perplexed, venture to inquire what > exactly this list is purporting to discuss. > Sincerely, > H Uniatz. (master spy). On Thu, 27 Jun 91 08:33:06 PDT, 3501P@NAVPGS.BITNET replied: >> i've just subscribed to your list, being struck >> by the beauty of its name. So far, i've >> received some strange material related to severed heads, >> and thus, being perplexed, venture to inquire what >> exactly this list is purporting to discuss. >> Sincerely, >> H Uniatz. (master spy). > > We talk about white rice, black power, and liver. And >what's so strange about severed heads? If mine wasn't attached >to my neck, it would probably be severed too. Roll the rill... > --Jeffrey On Thu, 27 Jun 91 20:12:00 GMT, "next to of course god america i..." <STANIFHLATHU@CS8700.UCG.IE> returned: >> We talk about white rice, black power, and liver. > How absorbing. Well, may i divert your attention from the > contemplation of the above for a min ou deux to ask > whether there is anyone out there who would agree > with me that saki, o henry, the saint and nigel molesworth > are, collectively, god? i regret that i have still not > formulated a view on severed heads, but, being one > of enterprise, i shall no doubt do so soon... > And what or where is "stony brook"? > Sincerely, > H Uniatz. (philologist). On Thu, 27 Jun 91 15:21:14 CDT, "Zoroaster, the Human Treasurer" <CHEATING@NUACVM.BITNET> should have said: >Thank you very kindly for your inquiry, H. Uniatz, who, I see from your >signatures, has been dualcareering, or perhaps these are two different >individuals with the same exquisite nom de stylo but different triplets >initiating modes. Although there might be others venturing into this >circle of circles (turn round three times, protectorate to dealings with >your more sordid types) who could leap in with good humor and proclaim >underisively "Let's start a Fan Club!" (though I doubt, quite honestly, I >could join, unless there were divisions or chapters or lodges by which I >might find myself a member of the Fraternal Order of the Slavings & Lien >Saint Concession Vendors League), I will be glad simply to agree with your >assertion if, in fact, you will be so kind as to keep to your offer to >divert my attention "for a min ou deux" and keep me thus: elsewise, it >might be possible that, say, such condictions could run into place as to >divert attentions (rilly) for an entire year, say, and I can tell by your >signature that, possessing a noble demeanor, you would be taken aback (and >aback again) if the mere idea were more than some idle-time fantaste-test. >You see, m'dear (IFF I may be so bold as to use that familial style, >otherwise, "H."), Something Might Come Up, and, it's just possible, if you >Consider it, that, say, you might, in a grand gesture, quote to me from >some terribly out of Fashion DAP (Dead American Poet), pausing briefly to >comment on how badly I spell you're name; and, in so doing, you might give >me a momentary rush of adreniline, or at the very least have some influence >on my synapses misfiring, and I could very easily fall in love with you -- >oops! but it could be! yes! -- and propose to unite our pathetic and >measily-going cognoscible nodes into one (1) grandstanding all-encompassing >putative transmitter; you might take acception, if you're that type, brave, >daring, intrigued by what goes on here (though, no doubt, you won't care) >and persevering (as per severed heads) to find that, frightened off by my >own hoisted boisterousness, unknown to this phrase, renege almost before >I'd readied your occasional lapse, and parade prominently as Idiot, Grand >Idiot, and be (& rightly so!) damned to the most narrow pits of hell. At >about this point, we might give the other listmemes who find it too >encumbersome to ScrollDown past the first five (5) lines, and, assaulted, >discover how unmerciful this all might be. > >Oh, yes, wild speculation, no question about it, the mere suggestion is >enough to make you toss yr screen to the floor or crumble chalk or put on >yr best "I am not a terrorist" smile or, dreadful to imagine, cause you to >begin speaking to yr Mother as if she reads this list (though, of coarse, >she's welcome-on-in to do so) -- after all, who am I to make such >statements? You might investigate that, even, happen onto an error- >statement in my credit slips submitted with my typical non-spelling >flailing to the HISTORY listserv being for the benifit of Daniel A. Foss, >who might join in, even, and REVIEWing yr options, disclose such that you >might opinionate yrself that it is, ultimately, despite incongruencies, one >and the same, and you might commit a placardinal sin, say, after making >certain that things would be for the better by relocating from the >Westernmost to the Easternmost so as to better (and earlier) enjoy the >sunrises, thereby auditching both of the unwieldly models from above for >something dreadfully uninspired as, say, H. (for your first initial -- I >know nothing, I know nothing, I know nothing), and then a numerical abbr. >addr. without any clear significance, you might commit a cardinal sin and, >say, utter some name that you've picked up, might even do it twice >(((Perhaps, about then, you will be appropriated off of this list. You >will accuse me of having done it. I will deny it. I will help you back >on, while making the mistake of confessing to having a few spies of my own. >At this suggestion, you, relievedly distressed, shall swear a relentless, >tactile, and acerbic battle against me, even as I'm mentioning that I could >bring myself to error-fix and make you an Honest Woman, which will, of >course, send you into an unretractable rage.))), might even become >enamo(u)red of another, say, Dan Boyd, who I've already written a po-em >for, it occurs to me, so there is no need to bring dues to bear later on, >all the while treating SBRHYM and myself, e.g., that is, e.g., myself, as >divertissemementos while living contentedly in ten (10) work-related lists, >without bother, while you shall have made a mockery of any work I'd be >glintzy enough to attempt to do by "master spy" catching-style >infiltrations. Fair enough, of course. > >Could any of this happen? More to the point, would you be willing to take >the chance that it could? That individual, 3501P@NAVPGS.BITNET, most >certainly would be aghast; he, insula, would be one to declare your posts >null-&-void before they'd even reached his unreading eyes, though, later, >it would be no doubt revealed that he actually believes us to be one and >the same, as if the marriage (1st (first) proposal) had gone through and >we'd been joined at the node; he'll soften, good lad that he is. But would >you? I confess, I do not know if I am willing to take this chance, so, if >you decide to stick around, perhaps I'd best be off with an arm-wave of >TELL LISTSERV AT SBCCVM UNSUBSCRIBE SBRHYM-L. As I indicated, the >arresting proposition of falling in love with you is likely to give me >abrasions of the skull, and I would be better off (perhaps) keeping those >areas of my life identifiable to the hordes gathered at the door as Work >free from complication -- all this in spite of the fact that I, which is to >say, the node CHEATING@NUACVM, later to be changed by great need, I, do not >exist. Obsessions, or so I'm told, are very bad things, very bad things; I >embarrass myself to admit to them, but, as such, they keep fairly tolerable >company when I forget to sleep and spend hours sidelonging for credible >estates. > >Oh, yes, before I forget, in response to your kitshcen: Stony Brook is >where Daniel Foss is. Sorry, I mean George Papoon. > >T. Happy Anniversary. Darling.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TEST%92062614265197@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU!CHEATINGShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f7b0,5d0be8d22b628a18,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10f7b0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-26 03:25:36 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU!CHEATING Message-ID: <TEST%92062614265197@PSUVM.PSU.EDU> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.test Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1992 19:08:04 GMT Sender: TESTing list for NETNEWS <TEST@PSUVM.BITNET> Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM From: CHEATING@CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU Subject: Re: tentative inquiry Comments: To: Multiple recipients of list SBRHYM-L <SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM.BITNET> Lines: 134