Article View: bit.listserv.test
Article #2717The Difference
From: Juniper Sage
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1992 03:43
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1992 03:43
38 lines
3178 bytes
3178 bytes
Seeing as how it has lain fallow, I do not imagine that M shall be responding any time soon to your inquiry, H760, as to the operating difference between the two of us, and I suppose it fitting that I should post an answer and explanation as it is I who posits the two of us as "separate but equal"; I do not believe that M cares a scant iota should you wish to believe that an identity function is in place here. M may very well be correct, as it may not have a huge impact on the "washoutcome" if you feel M to be attempting to assume the role of con artist or, as you would have it, simple and tiresome liar, and working through a Sybil split of dramatic pretention. Regardless, some simple points: M believes the world of you, and, as a result, spends much time in a fog of paranoia certain that the person sitting at the table in the corner who happened to glance up did no such thing and is taking detailed notes on what food is being ingested for any "ammo" files you may yet have lying about, cluttering your state-funded account. This gives M, I suspect, a good deal of self-grandeur and self-aggrandization with which to wile away the hours of unproductivity which is otherwise spent with the more trivial and mundane aspects of unproductivity, such as inventing psychiatric and physiological explanations for an inability to speak in anything but inarticulate and noncommittal grunts, if even that. M also toils to maintain an accurate and up-to-date HUNIATZ file, though mostly that involves, as you correctly conjecture, scanning the dailies on the exceedingly remote chance that spotting your name in a police blotter or political untidiness in the international arena; as a result of this, M knows more, and will "waffle" on far longer, than one might wish M to about the complications of the Royal Family; Princess Diana has even come to be referred to as "poor dear", a grating condescension. However, perhaps M may no longer be a factor in this breezy list, in which case I might readily return this account, as there have been no sightings of our beloved hero since late Friday afternoon, sometime around 18.00 EDT, when M struck me for no clear reason while sputtering inchoately about "never leaving operatives out in the open" and promising revenge. I do not profess to understand this statement, nor, truthfully, do I care to; still, I suspect that the blow was not intended for me. Juniper Sage
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TEST%92063012463495@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SBCCVM.BITNET!CHEATINGShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f7b0,b188b1df763a4f9c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10f7b0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-30 02:14:54 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SBCCVM.BITNET!CHEATING Message-ID: <TEST%92063012463495@PSUVM.PSU.EDU> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.test Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1992 23:43:00 EDT Sender: TESTing list for NETNEWS <TEST@PSUVM.BITNET> Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM From: Juniper Sage <CHEATING@SBCCVM.BITNET> Subject: The Difference Comments: To: Multiple recipients of list SBRHYM-L <SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM.BITNET> Lines: 38