Article View: bit.listserv.test
Article #2748Re: There but for...
From: HAG
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1992 14:40
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1992 14:40
40 lines
2957 bytes
2957 bytes
>Ah, yes, Hope, er, Angus, you should have sent that here for our >betterment and amusement. I am, of course, aghasted; you pegged >me down in full protracture: no speech be my can-do; I just hope >H. likes the way I look in a mini. Mightn't you give some advice? Ah dear me, my shame at posting what might have seemed like a slighting tale is such that even gentle admonishment has me shrouding my reddened visage in veils of embarassment. But I didn't think I had envisioned the miniskirt on your undoubtedly lissome limbs. Be that as it may, I will admit it was quite remiss, though not meant to do mischief, to drag the H and M monikers into what was simply meant as a bit of fluff representing my heartfelt thanks that I no longer call that benighted and concrete engirdled Long Isle my home. Truly, I can make little substantive comment on the H and M saga, having attempted, out of some other-timely sense of decorum, no doubt, to avert eyes and ears from an emotional affair carried out in such a public manner. >Pre-Hegemon, when you were the only God around, DAF stated (I >quote:) "God is married". Fancy your remebering that which I had so completely, till now, forgotten. I hope my memory lapse may be excused on the grounds that I was quite astonished (flabbergasted, amused) to be so deified by Daniel, the concept seeming quite ludicrous (ludicrous, that is, that I should have unwittingly inspired such, not that Daniel should have every right or power to engage in such actions as he chooses). Although I might add that while it seemed an impossibility then, it might seem more appropriate at this time to some matriarchists envisioning an earth-mother type goddess, given my current delicate condition. >Any suitorable recommendations to cop >that I might possess that same Medieval Harlequined jouissance >convoyed by yr recent tales? Thusly, all I've is "Once you have >bound her, never let her go" -- comments? Cliched story fragments, rambling comments, pitiful stabs at humour, gentle attempts at presenting alternative viewpoints, perhaps. But never, never would I presume to give advice. HAG
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TEST%92061809592385@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UVMVM.BITNET!HAGShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10f7b0,67924abb5f03d38b
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f7b0,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-18 22:50:06 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UVMVM.BITNET!HAG
Message-ID: <TEST%92061809592385@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.test
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1992 09:40:43 EST
Sender: TESTing list for NETNEWS <TEST@PSUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM
From: HAG@UVMVM.BITNET
Subject: Re: There but for...
Comments: To: Multiple recipients of list SBRHYM-L <SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM.BITNET>
In-Reply-To: Message of Wed,
17 Jun 1992 12:58:49 CDT from <cheating@CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU>
Lines: 40