🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bit.listserv.test
Article #2748

Re: There but for...

#2748
From: HAG
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1992 14:40
40 lines
2957 bytes
>Ah, yes, Hope, er, Angus, you should have sent that here for our
>betterment and amusement.  I am, of course, aghasted; you pegged
>me down in full protracture: no speech be my can-do; I just hope
>H. likes the way I look in a mini.  Mightn't you give some advice?

Ah dear me, my shame at posting what might have seemed like a slighting
tale is such that even gentle admonishment has me shrouding my
reddened visage in veils of embarassment. But I didn't think I had
envisioned the miniskirt on your undoubtedly lissome limbs. Be that as
it may, I will admit it was quite remiss, though not meant to do
mischief, to drag the H and M monikers into what was simply meant
as a bit of fluff representing my heartfelt thanks that I no longer call
that benighted and concrete engirdled Long Isle my home. Truly, I can
make little substantive comment on the H and M saga, having attempted,
out of some other-timely sense of decorum, no doubt, to avert eyes and
ears from an emotional affair carried out in such a public manner.

>Pre-Hegemon, when you were the only God around, DAF stated (I
>quote:) "God is married".

Fancy your remebering that which I had so completely, till now, forgotten.
I hope my memory lapse may be excused on the grounds that I was quite
astonished (flabbergasted, amused) to be so deified by Daniel, the concept
seeming quite ludicrous (ludicrous, that is, that I should have unwittingly
inspired such, not that Daniel should have every right or power to
engage in such actions as he chooses). Although I might add that while
it seemed an impossibility then, it might seem more appropriate at this
time to some matriarchists envisioning an earth-mother type goddess,
given my current delicate condition.

>Any suitorable recommendations to cop
>that I might possess that same Medieval Harlequined jouissance
>convoyed by yr recent tales?  Thusly, all I've is "Once you have
>bound her, never let her go" -- comments?

Cliched story fragments, rambling comments, pitiful stabs at humour,
gentle attempts at presenting alternative viewpoints, perhaps. But never,
never would I presume to give advice.

HAG
Technical Details
Message-ID: <TEST%92061809592385@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UVMVM.BITNET!HAG

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10f7b0,67924abb5f03d38b
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f7b0,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-18 22:50:06 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UVMVM.BITNET!HAG
Message-ID: <TEST%92061809592385@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.test
Date:         Thu, 18 Jun 1992 09:40:43 EST
Sender:       TESTing list for NETNEWS <TEST@PSUVM.BITNET>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM
From:         HAG@UVMVM.BITNET
Subject:      Re: There but for...
Comments: To: Multiple recipients of list SBRHYM-L <SBRHYM-L@SBCCVM.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  Message of Wed,
              17 Jun 1992 12:58:49 CDT from <cheating@CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU>
Lines: 40