Thread View: bit.listserv.tsorexx
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Phil Smith III
Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:33
Re: Tuning Question
Author: Phil Smith III
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:33
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:33
18 lines
1773 bytes
1773 bytes
Adrian Stern wrote: >God you need spoonfeeding <trimmed> Wow, rude much? My point remains: No kidding, one function call vs. two is cheaper. And as someone else noted, if you're performance tuning, the extra DO/END isn't free, either. I know, "I use the compiler". That's great. Not everyone does; if you're going to claim to offer tuning tips, be clear and complete. That goes for your example, too, which *wasn't* clear OR complete, since it didn't work as written. ...phsiii ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For TSO-REXX subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to LISTSERV@VM.MARIST.EDU with the message: INFO TSO-REXX
Re: Tuning Question
Author: Adrian Stern
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:32
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:32
37 lines
2469 bytes
2469 bytes
It was neither an example nor meant to work! It was just a sketch example - which is why I wrote spoon-feeding - do you really need everything spelled out? My whole point was to illustrate how to save on calls - I didn't know you needed working examples - and there is NO extra do/end since there's no code! God! -----Original Message----- From: TSO REXX Discussion List [mailto:TSO-REXX@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Phil Smith III Sent: den 4 mars 2013 12:33 To: TSO-REXX@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [TSO-REXX] Tuning Question Adrian Stern wrote: >God you need spoonfeeding <trimmed> Wow, rude much? My point remains: No kidding, one function call vs. two is cheaper. And as someone else noted, if you're performance tuning, the extra DO/END isn't free, either. I know, "I use the compiler". That's great. Not everyone does; if you're going to claim to offer tuning tips, be clear and complete. That goes for your example, too, which *wasn't* clear OR complete, since it didn't work as written. ...phsiii ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For TSO-REXX subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to LISTSERV@VM.MARIST.EDU with the message: INFO TSO-REXX ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For TSO-REXX subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to LISTSERV@VM.MARIST.EDU with the message: INFO TSO-REXX
Re: Tuning Question
Author: Bodoh John Robert [Contractor]
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 13:02
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 13:02
51 lines
3118 bytes
3118 bytes
I didn't know that the Lord subscribed to this list. I'll have to be more careful. John -----Original Message----- From: TSO REXX Discussion List [mailto:TSO-REXX@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Adrian Stern Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 7:32 AM To: TSO-REXX@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [TSO-REXX] Tuning Question It was neither an example nor meant to work! It was just a sketch example - which is why I wrote spoon-feeding - do you really need everything spelled out? My whole point was to illustrate how to save on calls - I didn't know you needed working examples - and there is NO extra do/end since there's no code! God! -----Original Message----- From: TSO REXX Discussion List [mailto:TSO-REXX@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Phil Smith III Sent: den 4 mars 2013 12:33 To: TSO-REXX@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [TSO-REXX] Tuning Question Adrian Stern wrote: >God you need spoonfeeding <trimmed> Wow, rude much? My point remains: No kidding, one function call vs. two is cheaper. And as someone else noted, if you're performance tuning, the extra DO/END isn't free, either. I know, "I use the compiler". That's great. Not everyone does; if you're going to claim to offer tuning tips, be clear and complete. That goes for your example, too, which *wasn't* clear OR complete, since it didn't work as written. ...phsiii ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For TSO-REXX subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to LISTSERV@VM.MARIST.EDU with the message: INFO TSO-REXX ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For TSO-REXX subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to LISTSERV@VM.MARIST.EDU with the message: INFO TSO-REXX ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For TSO-REXX subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to LISTSERV@VM.MARIST.EDU with the message: INFO TSO-REXX
Re: Tuning Question
Author: Bob Bridges
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:39
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:39
54 lines
3881 bytes
3881 bytes
Adrian, you really are unnecessarily abrasive sometimes -- but only sometimes -- and you must be aware of it yourself. I think you just let your frustration get away with you. But for what it's worth, ~I~ knew what you meant by your example, though I had to think about it a while. (It wasn't even your example, fully; you just fleshed out someone else's a little.) ...Oh, and although you and that sabra (Mickey, his name is) brought your exchange on yourselves, his comments about your abilities are patently untrue. But then, you knew that. --- Bob Bridges rhbridg@attglobal.net, cell 336 382-7313 bbridges-vendor@foodlion.com, 704 310-4526 /* On the international front, President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin sign an arms-reduction treaty under which the U.S. will destroy about two-thirds of its nuclear arsenal, and Russia will ''make every effort, within reason'' to try to find out who, exactly, HAS its nuclear arsenal. -from Dave Barry's 2002 "Year in Review" */ -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Stern Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 07:32 It was neither an example nor meant to work! It was just a sketch example - which is why I wrote spoon-feeding - do you really need everything spelled out? My whole point was to illustrate how to save on calls - I didn't know you needed working examples - and there is NO extra do/end since there's no code! God! -----Original Message----- From: Phil Smith III Sent: den 4 mars 2013 12:33 Wow, rude much? My point remains: No kidding, one function call vs. two is cheaper. And as someone else noted, if you're performance tuning, the extra DO/END isn't free, either. I know, "I use the compiler". That's great. Not everyone does; if you're going to claim to offer tuning tips, be clear and complete. That goes for your example, too, which *wasn't* clear OR complete, since it didn't work as written. --- Adrian Stern wrote: >God you need spoonfeeding <trimmed> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For TSO-REXX subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to LISTSERV@VM.MARIST.EDU with the message: INFO TSO-REXX
Re: Tuning Question
Author: Adrian Stern
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 06:53
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 06:53
71 lines
4205 bytes
4205 bytes
It is extremely frustrating to throw out a simple idea, simply put and have it misunderstood. And I think many people are far too sensitive - it's possible the media makes sarcasm appear abrasive. -----Original Message----- From: TSO REXX Discussion List [mailto:TSO-REXX@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Bob Bridges Sent: den 11 mars 2013 23:39 To: TSO-REXX@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [TSO-REXX] Tuning Question Adrian, you really are unnecessarily abrasive sometimes -- but only sometimes -- and you must be aware of it yourself. I think you just let your frustration get away with you. But for what it's worth, ~I~ knew what you meant by your example, though I had to think about it a while. (It wasn't even your example, fully; you just fleshed out someone else's a little.) ...Oh, and although you and that sabra (Mickey, his name is) brought your exchange on yourselves, his comments about your abilities are patently untrue. But then, you knew that. --- Bob Bridges rhbridg@attglobal.net, cell 336 382-7313 bbridges-vendor@foodlion.com, 704 310-4526 /* On the international front, President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin sign an arms-reduction treaty under which the U.S. will destroy about two-thirds of its nuclear arsenal, and Russia will ''make every effort, within reason'' to try to find out who, exactly, HAS its nuclear arsenal. -from Dave Barry's 2002 "Year in Review" */ -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Stern Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 07:32 It was neither an example nor meant to work! It was just a sketch example - which is why I wrote spoon-feeding - do you really need everything spelled out? My whole point was to illustrate how to save on calls - I didn't know you needed working examples - and there is NO extra do/end since there's no code! God! -----Original Message----- From: Phil Smith III Sent: den 4 mars 2013 12:33 Wow, rude much? My point remains: No kidding, one function call vs. two is cheaper. And as someone else noted, if you're performance tuning, the extra DO/END isn't free, either. I know, "I use the compiler". That's great. Not everyone does; if you're going to claim to offer tuning tips, be clear and complete. That goes for your example, too, which *wasn't* clear OR complete, since it didn't work as written. --- Adrian Stern wrote: >God you need spoonfeeding <trimmed> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For TSO-REXX subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to LISTSERV@VM.MARIST.EDU with the message: INFO TSO-REXX ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For TSO-REXX subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to LISTSERV@VM.MARIST.EDU with the message: INFO TSO-REXX
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads