Re: EXECMOD

Article View: bit.listserv.vm-util

Article #3775

Back to bit.listserv.vm-util Previous Next

#3775

From: Juan M. Courcoul
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1992 15:56

9 lines
1043 bytes

Now that the EXECMOD discussion is progressing past the "where can I get
it" phase, into performance considerations, how well does an EXECMODed
exec stack up against a compiled one (using IBM's REXX compiler) ?

Has anybody tried comparing these two ways of digesting an exec ?

Thanks

JMC

Technical Details

Message-ID: <920211.095615.CST.COURCOUL@VMTECQRO.qro.itesm.mx>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!VMTECQRO.QRO.ITESM.MX!COURCOUL

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ab65,f416170c000cf56c
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ab65,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-11 13:00:41 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!VMTECQRO.QRO.ITESM.MX!COURCOUL
Organization: Instituto Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Queretaro
Message-ID: <920211.095615.CST.COURCOUL@VMTECQRO.qro.itesm.mx>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vm-util
Date:         Tue, 11 Feb 1992 09:56:15 CST
Sender:       VM Utilities Discussion List <VM-UTIL@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
From:         "Juan M. Courcoul" <COURCOUL@VMTECQRO.QRO.ITESM.MX>
Subject:      Re: EXECMOD
In-Reply-To:  Message of Tue, 11 Feb 1992 16:20:10 IST from <MAINTX@BGUVM>