Article View: bit.listserv.wx-chase
Article #52Re: No bucks, but credit
From: lenapelady
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 00:00
53 lines
2921 bytes
2921 bytes
Hi Sam, You wrote, ex parte: "> The museum then sweetened the pot with a chance to have his work backed by > them, plus recognition, plus money. He pitched a hissy fit and declined. He > got his way. The writer didn't (should state "couldn't") use his photos," Correction to your correction: the wording was correct. Writer, per contract and agreement, *could use the photos already paid for. Writer selected "didn't." As far as anything else, don't know how many times I can apologize. for posting. Apologize for sharing my enthusiasms. Apologize for thinking that there are various levels of value; and various levels of participation (i.e. top, top-dollar professional commanding gazillions for everyhing, middle-range, talented and enthusiastic but just-starting-out newbies). Apologize for not understanding that although in my professional community there are often trade-offs, that none of us should ever, ever, ever, have done anything for less than New York top dollar. Therefore, that dead horse is no longer available for beating. I suppose I should also apologize for posting, too, so consider it done. About this list: this is the second time I've been here; first came here before a move (different name). Didn't say a word the first time. Didn't say a word for a long time the second time. I think this list has tremendous value. There's the science. There's the discussion of that science. There's thee posting of photos and the discussions of lessons learned in getting them. However, there's also the fact that although there's more than 700 people subscribed, there are very few people who post or participate. I've seen some names come through, then some down-putting comment (if they're lucky, usually they're ignored) and then pffft--don't hear them speaking again. I wonder why? As for me, I'm heading back to lurk mode. Best wises to all of you for SAFE, productive chases, P.Phillips +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from WX-CHASE send e-mail to LISTSERV@PO.UIUC.EDU with "unsub wx-chase" in the body of your message. For help with WX-CHASE write chris@siu.edu or see http://www.inlink.com/~landmb/intro.html
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<001201be4932$d76893a0$c3b6bfa8@default>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1093dc,c42cd1fad78d01cb X-Google-Attributes: gid1093dc,public From: lenapelady <ldef007@EARTHLINK.NET> Subject: Re: No bucks, but credit Date: 1999/01/26 Message-ID: <001201be4932$d76893a0$c3b6bfa8@default> X-Deja-AN: 437253760 Sender: The WX-CHASE list <WX-CHASE@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Comments: To: k5kj@pulse.net X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: lenapelady <ldef007@EARTHLINK.NET> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.wx-chase