🚀 go-pugleaf

Just to pick a nit here:

On Tue, 13 Jul 1993 10:46:21 -0400, "F. Scott Ophof" <Ophof@CS.UWINDSOR.CA>
   said:
>On Tue, 13 Jul 1993 08:19:37 EST Nick Laflamme said:
>>         Sorry, this newsgroup/list is for the XEDIT editor in VM,
>>not for some editor used with the X11 protocols.
>Sorry Nick, you maybe didn't know there's "THE", "uni-XEDIT", and
>"XC", all clones/look-alikes/ports of VM XEDIT,

"clones" or "look-alikes" certainly.  "Ports" definitely NOT.

>                                                and all available
>for the Un*x boxes.  :-)

True, but I suspect that Nick suspected that the original questor was
mislead by the name into believing that this group was for some sort
of X-Windows software.

[...]
>Gentle list readers, since there's no discussion list for all these
>XEDITs, would it be possible if they could be talked about here?

I got no problem with that.  This list is pretty low-volume.  And I'd
wouldn't mind seeing progress reports about these other packages.

>In other words I'm asking for a change of the scope of discussion of
>this list.  There's mucho interest in XEDIT out there, at least the
>concept (more than I originally thought).

Well, I'll take your word for it.  But I haven't seen many indicators
that this is true.  XEDIT is the greatest editor I've ever seen.  But
it sure doesn't seem to be catching fire on very many non-VM platforms.

Bill
>Regards, and thanks in advance.
>$$\