Article View: bit.listserv.xmailer
Article #781Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA
From: John F. Chandler
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1992 20:59
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1992 20:59
15 lines
1361 bytes
1361 bytes
> The macros (and CMS function) needed to be a good citizen were introduced in
> CMS 5.
Was it, perhaps, also introduced as an add-on to CMS 4?
> Once these changes are made Mailer will no longer work on releases
> earlier than CMS 5. I mention this here so that sites still running CMS 4
> will be forwarned.
If the only purpose for making the change is to allow Mailer to use an
SFS disk, I'd have to ask, "Why bother?" Mailer needs to have its "A"
disk space reserved so that there is always room for the maximum allowed
size mail file, but that maximum size isn't likely to change, so what's
the point of using SFS?
John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PEPMNT.920318.155954.RC0@CFAAMP.HARVARD.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CFAAMP.BITNET!PEPMNTShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1161f7,964e461ce8f4e460 X-Google-Attributes: gid1161f7,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-03-18 13:27:44 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CFAAMP.BITNET!PEPMNT Message-ID: <PEPMNT.920318.155954.RC0@CFAAMP.HARVARD.EDU> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1992 15:59:00 EST Sender: Crosswell Mailer <XMAILER@UGA.BITNET> From: "John F. Chandler" <PEPMNT@CFAAMP.BITNET> Subject: Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA In-Reply-To: jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU message of Wed, 18 Mar 1992 15:21:05 -0500