Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA

Article View: bit.listserv.xmailer

Article #783

Back to bit.listserv.xmailer Previous Next

#783

From: Jim Jones
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1992 22:00

5 lines
903 bytes

 I have to agree with John Chandler on this one.  Even if people do want
 to give users SFS disks, why does MAILER need one?  I'm not arguing that
 there aren't good reasons to do so, I just don't understand what they are.

 -jj

Technical Details

Message-ID: <XMAILER%92031817034793@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!JHUVM.BITNET!JIMJ

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1161f7,964e461ce8f4e460
X-Google-Attributes: gid1161f7,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-03-18 14:10:08 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!JHUVM.BITNET!JIMJ
Message-ID: <XMAILER%92031817034793@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Wed, 18 Mar 1992 17:00:41 EST
Sender:       Crosswell Mailer <XMAILER@UGA.BITNET>
From:         Jim Jones <JIMJ@JHUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA
In-Reply-To:  Message of Wed,
              18 Mar 1992 16:30:41 EST from <MSC3@NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU>