Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA

Article View: bit.listserv.xmailer

Article #787

Back to bit.listserv.xmailer Previous Next

#787

From: John F. Chandler
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1992 23:44

7 lines
1062 bytes

> Hope this gives an idea of why I think mailer has to atleast tolerate SFS.

None of those scenarios seems as important to me as several things that
have been pending since 1988 or so, such as efficient reading of spool
files and the ability to decode NETDATA, DISK DUMP, CARD DUMP, and/or
PRINT files (maybe not all of those, but surely NETDATA).
                                  John

Technical Details

Message-ID: <PEPMNT.920318.184443.RC0@CFAAMP.HARVARD.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CFAAMP.BITNET!PEPMNT

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1161f7,964e461ce8f4e460
X-Google-Attributes: gid1161f7,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-03-18 16:06:15 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CFAAMP.BITNET!PEPMNT
Message-ID: <PEPMNT.920318.184443.RC0@CFAAMP.HARVARD.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Wed, 18 Mar 1992 18:44:00 EST
Sender:       Crosswell Mailer <XMAILER@UGA.BITNET>
From:         "John F. Chandler" <PEPMNT@CFAAMP.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA
In-Reply-To:  jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU message of Wed, 18 Mar 1992 17:40:46 -0500