Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA

Article View: bit.listserv.xmailer

Article #790

Back to bit.listserv.xmailer Previous Next

#790

From: Fred Dayton
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1992 18:17

14 lines
1350 bytes

I think the real point here is that more programs are using IUCV for
communications.  As a requirement for those programs to inter-operate
it is necessary for programs using IUCV to be well behaved which means
use the rules and macros introduced in CMS 5.

We have all spent time trying to get some ill-behaved program running.
I think the real point here is that Mailer is such an important part
of our mail system that it should not be relegated to the "I don't work
with others" class of programs.

As an aside, using SFS for the programs does make better use of disk
space and SFS sure looks like the future direction IBM is going in VM.

-Fred-

Technical Details

Message-ID: <XMAILER%92031913245496@BITNIC.EDUCOM.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PSUORVM.CC.PDX.EDU!FRED

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1161f7,964e461ce8f4e460
X-Google-Attributes: gid1161f7,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-03-19 10:33:07 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PSUORVM.CC.PDX.EDU!FRED
Message-ID: <XMAILER%92031913245496@BITNIC.EDUCOM.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Thu, 19 Mar 1992 10:17:11 PST
Sender:       Crosswell Mailer <XMAILER@UGA.BITNET>
From:         Fred Dayton <FRED@PSUORVM.CC.PDX.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA
In-Reply-To:  Message of Wed,
              18 Mar 1992 16:30:41 EST from <MSC3@NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU>