Article View: bit.listserv.xmailer
Article #800Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA
From: John F. Chandler
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1992 21:39
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1992 21:39
11 lines
1333 bytes
1333 bytes
> Use of NETDATA requires changes to XMAILER NAMES (or a new file) so that the
> newer version of Mailer can interoperate with the older versions. My
> inclination is to change the MG process to use the :server tag directly (and
> drop the MG C code) but that's just how I feel today.
Note that the adoption of NETDATA could be phased in: Mailer could
learn to *read* it before taking the next step of *sending* it. That
could allow the FAL SMTP server to use NETDATA for delivering to the
local Mailer, for example. Such changes could go forward without
waiting for the redesign of XMAILER NAMES.
John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PEPMNT.920324.163917.RC0@CFAAMP.HARVARD.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!CFAAMP.BITNET!PEPMNTShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1161f7,964e461ce8f4e460 X-Google-Attributes: gid1161f7,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-03-24 13:39:00 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!CFAAMP.BITNET!PEPMNT Message-ID: <PEPMNT.920324.163917.RC0@CFAAMP.HARVARD.EDU> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1992 16:39:00 EST Sender: Crosswell Mailer <XMAILER@UGA.BITNET> From: "John F. Chandler" <PEPMNT@CFAAMP.BITNET> Subject: Re: Bad MAILER 2.08 interaction with ESA In-Reply-To: jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU message of Mon, 23 Mar 1992 17:24:37 -0500