🚀 go-pugleaf

> > Use of NETDATA requires changes to XMAILER NAMES (or a new file) so
that the
> > newer version of Mailer can interoperate with the older versions.  My
> > inclination is to change the MG process to use the :server tag
directly (and
> > drop the MG C code) but that's just how I feel today.
>
> Note that the adoption of NETDATA could be phased in:  Mailer could
> learn to *read* it before taking the next step of *sending* it.  That
> could allow the FAL SMTP server to use NETDATA for delivering to the
> local Mailer, for example.  Such changes could go forward without
> waiting for the redesign of XMAILER NAMES.
>                                        John

For me, the only reason to implement NETDATA is to get lines longer than 80
characters.  This requires mailer to both read and send NETDATA format.  It
also requires some sort of agreement on what to do when the lines are longer
than 80 characters and the receiving site cannot accept NETDATA.

   John