Article View: bit.listserv.xtropy-l
Article #473Re: Limits to physical size with nanotech
From: Bob Grahame
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1993 07:57
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1993 07:57
21 lines
1666 bytes
1666 bytes
I'll leave out any discussion of your project in particular, and whether BoaT is gaining the subtle aroma of COAST until I find out more. My current cynicism level is running rather high, to match my bitter&twisted mood. :-| Don't go for W4WG yet, unless truly desparate. It can be a real can of worms once you get more than about half a dozen nodes. Even MS-Word tends to crash from time to time under it, and the performance is much worse than Win 3.1. There is a new (and better designed) version in the wings, but the current beta is more of a late alpha, IMH(but NDA'd)O. Novell is far from dead in BT, and could blow BoaT out of the water if they'd only open up their protocols a bit. I think they've realised this, from talk I've heard in P&SM. I'll get back to you soon, Regards, Bob.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<memo.365273@cix.compulink.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!rutgers!ukma!cunyvm!psuvm!auvm!CIX.COMPULINK.CO.UK!BGRAHAMEShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fdeb7,e651e230878da66d
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdeb7,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-06-28 01:46:27 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!rutgers!ukma!cunyvm!psuvm!auvm!CIX.COMPULINK.CO.UK!BGRAHAME
From: bgrahame@CIX.COMPULINK.CO.UK (Bob Grahame)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xtropy-l
Subject: Re: Limits to physical size with nanotech
Message-ID: <memo.365273@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Date: 28 Jun 93 07:57:52 GMT
Sender: Extropians - discussion/development of Extropian ideas
<XTROPY-L@UBVM.BITNET>
Reply-To: bgrahame@cix.compulink.co.uk
Lines: 21
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU,
@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU:owner-xtropy-l@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>
Return-Path: <@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU:bgrahame@CIX.COMPULINK.CO.UK>