🚀 go-pugleaf

Subject: <URL:http://laptop.media.mit.edu/faq.html> MIT Media Lab: $100
    Laptop FAQ

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Nicholas Negroponte, founding chairman of MIT's Media Laboratory,
answers questions on the initiative.

-------------------------------------------------------------
> What is the $100 Laptop, really?
> The proposed $100 machine will be a Linux-based, with a dual-mode
> display97both a full-color, transmissive DVD mode, and a second
> display option that is black and white reflective and
> sunlight-readable at 3X the resolution. The laptop will have a 500MHz
> processor and 128MB of DRAM, with 500MB of Flash memory; it will not
> have a hard disk, but it will have four USB ports. The laptops will
> have wireless broadband that, among other things, allows them to work
> as a mesh network; each laptop will be able to talk to its nearest
> neighbors, creating an ad hoc, local area network. The laptops will
> use innovative power (including wind-up) and will be able to do most
> everything except store huge amounts of data.

A machine with the described specification would be more than 
adequate to be very usefull. Except that the wind-up-power will be 
more expensive to acheive reliabily than the all the rest combined.
Consider that the users don't expect a 2 weeks use and throw away
item.

> Why do children in developing nations need laptops?
> Laptops are both a window and a tool: a window into the world and a
> tool with which to think. They are a wonderful way for all children
> to "learn learning" through independent interaction and exploration.
> Why not a desktop computer, or 'even better' a recycled desktop
> machine?
> Desktops are cheaper, but mobility is important, especially with
> regard to taking the computer home at night. Kids in the developing
> world need the newest technology, especially really rugged hardware
> and innovative software. Recent work with schools in Maine has shown
> the huge value of using a laptop across all of one's studies, as well
> as for play. Bringing the laptop home engages the family. In one
> Cambodian village where we have been working, there is no
> electricity, thus the laptop is, among other things, the brightest
> light source in the home.
> 
> Finally, regarding recycled machines: if we estimate 100 million
> available used desktops, and each one requires only one hour of human
> attention to refurbish, reload, and handle, that is forty-five
> thousand work years. 

This reasoning exposes the writer as not having a clue how the 3rd
world operates  -  as is the case understandably, of all 'do gooders'
who haven't had appropriate on the ground experience.

As cow-dung is not seen in India as a negative pollutant, but a
positive valuable asset, so also the opportunity for countless
otherwise unemployed people to tinker with millions of scrap
PCs and get some of them working, potentially adds great education
and development to the tinkerers and their whole society.
If the problem of mains electricity was raised that would be valid.

> Thus, while we definitely encourage the
> recycling of used computers, it is not the solution for One Laptop
> per Child.
> How is it possible to get the cost so low?
> 
>   * First, by dramatically lowering the cost of the display. The
>     first-generation machine will have a novel, dual-mode display
>     that represents improvements to the LCD displays commonly found
>     in inexpensive DVD players. These displays can be used in
>     high-resolution black and white in bright sunlight97all at a cost
>     of approximately $35.
>   * Second, we will get the fat out of the systems. Today's laptops
>     have become obese. Two-thirds of their software is used to manage
>     the other third, which mostly does the same functions nine
>     different ways.
>   * Third, we will market the laptops in very large numbers
>     (millions), directly to ministries of education, which can
>     distribute them like textbooks.
> 
> Why is it important for each child to have a computer? What's wrong
> with community-access centers?
> One does not think of community pencils - kids have their own. They are
> tools to think with, sufficiently inexpensive to be used for work and
> play, drawing, writing, and mathematics. A computer can be the same,
> but far more powerful. Furthermore, there are many reasons it is
> important for a child to "own" somethin - like a football, doll, or
> book - not the least of which being that these belongings will be
> well-maintained through love and care.

This is only partly true. Public libraries where I keep 'my' millions of
books and don't have to pay for then to be dusted and sorted, work
very well.   

Trains and busses are perfectly viable.
There's no need for everybody to own a private velicle.

> What about connectivity? Aren't telecommunications services expensive
> in the developing world?
> When these machines pop out of the box, they will make a mesh network
> of their own, peer-to-peer. This is something initially developed at
> MIT and the Media Lab. We are also exploring ways to connect them to
> the backbone of the Internet at very low cost.

This would be great, but to my knowledge has not been acheived
in the worlds's most developed urban areas yet ?

> What can a $1000 laptop do that the $100 version can't?
> Not much. The plan is for the $100 Laptop to do almost everything.
> What it will not do is store a massive amount of data.

OK.

> How will these be marketed?
> The laptops will be sold to governments and issued to children by
> schools on a basis of "one laptop per child." Initial discussions
> have been held with China, India, Brazil, Argentina, Egypt, Nigeria,
> and Thailand. An additional, modest allocation of machines will be
> used to seed developer communities in a number of other countries. 

Yes the idea of 'seed development' is vital.
If it's viable, it will grow/spread like a bush fire [or bird-flu ?!].
No need to start with millions  - unless you a planning a scam/hit ?

> A commercial version of the machine will be explored in parallel.
> When do you anticipate these laptops reaching the market? 
> What do you see as the biggest hurdles?
> Our preliminary schedule is to have units ready for shipment by the
> end of 2006 or early 2007. Manufacturing will begin when 5 to 10
> million machines have been ordered and paid for in advance. <-!!

The whole thing sounds like a Nigerian 419 scam: $1000million 
in advance  !!

> The biggest hurdle will be manufacturing 100 million of anything.
> This is not just a supply-chain problem, but also a design problem.
> The scale is daunting, but I find myself amazed at what some
> companies are proposing to us. It feels as though at least half the
> problems are being solved by mere resolve.
> Who is the original design manufacturer (ODM) of the $100 laptop?
> Quanta Computer Inc. of Taiwan has been chosen as the original design
> manufacturer (ODM) for the $100 laptop project. The decision was made
> after the board reviewed bids from several possible manufacturing
> companies.
> Quanta Computer Inc. was founded in 1988 in Taiwan. With over US $10
> billion in sales, Quanta is the world's largest manufacturer of
> laptop PCs; the company also manufactures mobile phones, LCD TVs, and
> servers and storage products. In addition, Quanta recently opened a
> new US $200 million R&D center, Quanta R&D Complex (QRDC), in Taiwan.
> The facility, which opened in Q3 of 2005, has 2.2 million square feet
> of floor space, and a capacity to house up to 7,000 engineers.
> How will this initiative be structured?
> The $100 laptop is being developed by One Laptop per Child (OLPC), a
> Delaware-based, non-profit organization created by faculty members
> from the MIT Media Lab to design, manufacture, and distribute laptops
> that are sufficiently inexpensive to provide every child in the world
> access to knowledge and modern forms of education. OLPC is based on
> "constructionist" theories of learning pioneered by Seymour Papert
> and later Alan Kay, as well as the principles expressed in Nicholas
> Negroponte's book Being Digital. The founding corporate members are
> Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Brightstar, Google, News Corporation,
> Nortel, and Red Hat.
> OLPC is funding research at the Media Lab focused on developing the
> $100 Laptop.

== Chris Glur.     Your can fool some of the people, some of the time ?