Article View: bit.sci.purposive-behavior
Article #68Re: See how the fates their gifts alot
From: Kenneth Kitzke Value Creation Sy...
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 00:00
47 lines
2852 bytes
2852 bytes
[From Kenny Kitzke (990505.2120EDT)] <Rick Marken (990504.1250)> <I would just feel that my sense of decency (to say nothing of my understanding of the nature of control) was violated if I had to say that there is no coercion if I give in and do what some bully (coercer) wants (so that my goals are now aligned with his).> Well, your sense of decency is just too precious to me to disturb you any longer. I finally grasp why you battle this issue so hard. And, as written I agree with you. If a person gives in (unwillingly) to the bully's demand, it would be coercion by both our definitions. But, while the wimp resists giving in, I would not call it coercion. Would you? NATO is not coercing Yugoslavia, yet. All NATO has done so far it to do what it wants. And Yugoslavia is still doing what it wants, despite what NATO is doing. While I believe NATO can coerce Yugoslavia, it has not yet applied overwhelming force. Agree? <You, yourself, seemed to realize that coercion can be occurring even when the coercer need take no action (force) to keep the coercee behaving as the coercer wants.> If the coercee is acting against his will because he fears what the coercer will do, I would agree with you again, even if the coercer is taking no forceful action. <The coercer is always coercing because he is always able to intervene with overwhelming force if the observable actions of the other person are not what the coercer wants.> I would be willing to say that the person with the ability and intent to apply overwhelming force perceives being able to coerce. But, until the intended coercee actually perceives that force and because of that perception behaves in the way the coercer wants against their will, there is no coercion in the relationship. I feel bogged down again but understand your view and why better than ever. I just prefer my view. So when you say coercion is taking place, it will just have to be different that when I say it is taking place some times. There certainly will be times that we as coercer, coercee and observer both agree that coercive behavior seems to be taking place and we wish a non-coercive behavior would get both interactive parties what they want. Kenny
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<985a861a.24624e45@aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6c09,ba5ad6155a66ce63 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c09,public From: Kenneth Kitzke Value Creation Systems <KJKitzke@AOL.COM> Subject: Re: See how the fates their gifts alot Date: 1999/05/05 Message-ID: <985a861a.24624e45@aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 475026558 Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSGNET@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.sci.purposive-behavior