Article View: bit.sci.purposive-behavior
Article #76Re: Winning conflicts
From: Richard Marken
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 00:00
33 lines
1668 bytes
1668 bytes
[From Rick Marken (990506.0930)] Martin Taylor: > I think it not a good idea to use the term "coercion" to > apply to all interactions between people Me: >I agree! I think it should only be applied to the coercive >ones. Martin Taylor (990506 00:06) > I wrote that because I have understood you on several occasions > to say that all interactions between people are coercive according > to your definition--and indeed, if one analyses interactions using > your definition, they are truly all coercive. A very impressive job of understanding me;-) Coercion (to me) is control of the behavior of one person by another. If you think that, by this definition, all interactions between people are coercive then there we jolly well are, aren't we;-) Best Rick -- Richard S. Marken Phone or Fax: 310 474-0313 Life Learning Associates e-mail: rmarken@earthlink.net http://home.earthlink.net/~rmarken
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3731C492.45B2D17B@earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<l03130301b3556b9a76d2@[24.112.156.251]> <l03130301b356c5d5b828@[24.112.156.251]>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6c09,45b115b32e0bc41 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c09,public From: Richard Marken <rmarken@EARTHLINK.NET> Subject: Re: Winning conflicts Date: 1999/05/06 Message-ID: <3731C492.45B2D17B@earthlink.net> X-Deja-AN: 475033984 Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSGNET@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <l03130301b3556b9a76d2@[24.112.156.251]> <l03130301b356c5d5b828@[24.112.156.251]> X-Accept-Language: en Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Life Learning Associates MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.sci.purposive-behavior