Article View: bit.sci.purposive-behavior
Article #83Re: Winning conflicts
From: Richard Marken
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 00:00
66 lines
3193 bytes
3193 bytes
[From Rick Marken (990506.1500)] Me: >Coercion (to me) is control of the behavior of one person by >another. If you think that, by this definition, all interactions >between people are coercive then there we jolly well are, aren't >we;-) Martin Taylor (990506 13:35) -- > Think about it a bit deeper than as a slogan, please. I'll try. Though I was thinking about "control of behavior" as a model (with some aspect of another person's behavior as the controlled variable), not as a slogan. > Here's the drift: If I interact with you in any way, it is > because I wish to see some aspect of your behaviour differ > from what it would have been had I not interacted with you. I don't agree with this drift. > Can you think of an interaction that does not conform to > this paradigm Sure. In fact, it's more difficult to think of interactions where control of behavior is involved. Here are some non- controlling interactions I've had recently: I say "good morning" to people. I have lunch with people. I talk with people. I watch TV with my family. I work with people to produce some product. I hug my kids. . In all these cases I am interacting with people; in none do I do it in order to get a particular perception of some aspect of their behavior. If you suspect that I _am_ doing interacting with these people in order to control some aspect of their behavior you would have to demonstrate that I am using the test. But I am pretty sure that I am not controlling any aspect of people's behavior when I do these things. For example, if a colleague doesn't reply to my cheerful "good morning", I don't grab him by the collar and demand that he acknowledge my greeting. If people leave the table at lunch I don't drag them back. If people don't talk to me I don't point a gun at their head and say "talk". When I watch TV with my family I don't pounce on anyone who isn't facing the tube or who leaves the room. And so on. In fact, the only coercive interactions I can remember having have involved controlling the behavior of my (or someone else's) kids (when they were much younger) on those few occasions when I thought they would get hurt or hurt others if the behavior went unchecked. Best Rick --- Richard S. Marken Phone or Fax: 310 474-0313 Life Learning Associates e-mail: rmarken@earthlink.net http://home.earthlink.net/~rmarken
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<373210CC.EDC80856@earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<l03130301b3556b9a76d2@[24.112.156.251]> <l03130301b356c5d5b828@[24.112.156.251]> <l03130302b357836144bc@[24.112.156.251]>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6c09,45b115b32e0bc41 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c09,public From: Richard Marken <rmarken@EARTHLINK.NET> Subject: Re: Winning conflicts Date: 1999/05/06 Message-ID: <373210CC.EDC80856@earthlink.net> X-Deja-AN: 475038655 Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSGNET@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <l03130301b3556b9a76d2@[24.112.156.251]> <l03130301b356c5d5b828@[24.112.156.251]> <l03130302b357836144bc@[24.112.156.251]> X-Accept-Language: en Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Life Learning Associates MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.sci.purposive-behavior