Article View: bit.sci.purposive-behavior
Article #94Re: Simon's ant
From: Rick Marken
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 00:00
51 lines
2952 bytes
2952 bytes
[From Rick Marken (990428.1950)] Bruce Abbott (990428.1750 EST) > He [Herb Simon] conjectured that the complexity of this figure > was due mainly to the complexity of the environment And that's just dandy. But it tells us nothing about why that might be true (why the complexity of the action is "due mainly to" the complexity of the environment in this case). And what about other cases where the complexity of the action is clearly _not_ "due mainly to" the complexity of the environment -- as in the case of the position of the ant at each point in it's path, which should be affected by the complexity of the slope and texture of the terrain but is not. As I said in my post, Simon noticed one aspect of control (the aspect that most psychologists have noticed -- disturbance resistance) but not another (controlled variables). We can see both aspects of control in the crowd demo; we are usually most impressed by the complex paths that result from disturbance resistance (people avoiding others who disturb the variables these people control); but we can also notice (if we look carefully) that some variables -- such as minimum distance and destination -- are not influenced much by these disturbances. So some aspects of behavior seem to be due mainly to the complexity of the environment (movements of other people in the crowd, in this case) while other aspects of behavior seems to be due mainly to complexity inside the behaving system itself. It's this latter aspect behavior which Simon (along with all other conventional psychologists) seems to have ignored; it's the aspect of behavior to which PCT is trying to call people's attention. > You write as if you had some authoritative knowledge of what > Simon did or did not understand, did or did not know, yet I'll > bet you've never even read what he had to say. Well, I don't know if I have any "authoritative" knowledge of what Simon did or did not understand; but I have read several papers by him. I even refer to one in my "Blind men..." paper, which you migh want to read again. It's at: http://home.earthlink.net/~rmarken/papers.html Best Rick --- Richard S. Marken Phone or Fax: 310 474-0313 Life Learning Associates e-mail: rmarken@earthlink.net http://home.earthlink.net/~rmarken/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3727D6F3.4DE5@earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<19990428225302015.AAA302@nt10.ipfw.edu@ABBOTT.ipfw.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6c09,cebb83c66ce77edc X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c09,public From: Rick Marken <rmarken@EARTHLINK.NET> Subject: Re: Simon's ant Date: 1999/04/28 Message-ID: <3727D6F3.4DE5@earthlink.net> X-Deja-AN: 472231663 Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSGNET@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <19990428225302015.AAA302@nt10.ipfw.edu@ABBOTT.ipfw.edu> Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.sci.purposive-behavior