Article View: bit.software.international
Article #264Compile, Run-time, or link-time internationalization ?
From: Minh_T._Le.ESCP10
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1993 22:14
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1993 22:14
13 lines
1286 bytes
1286 bytes
I just bought a book SW Internationalization and Localization by Uren et al and studied a little bit about he topic. In Chapter4, it talks about three different design issues: 1) Compile-time Internationalization 2) Run-time internationalization 3) Link-time internationalization. One comment in the book indicates that large UNIX houses tend to use run-time language binding. I'd like to know a little more about the differences as well as the advantages and disadvantanges among the three. Could anyone, who is familiar with the topic give some help? Thanks in advance. --Minh
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2b6m3m$gak@rhino.cis.vutbr.cz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!scsing.switch.ch!swidir.switch.ch!news.univie.ac.at!aci.cvut.cz!rhino.cis.vutbr.cz!gatewayShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110cdc,3f9fb8bd06005a5,start X-Google-Attributes: gid110cdc,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-11-03 00:29:39 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!scsing.switch.ch!swidir.switch.ch!news.univie.ac.at!aci.cvut.cz!rhino.cis.vutbr.cz!gateway From: Minh_T._Le.ESCP10@xerox.com Newsgroups: bit.software.international Subject: Compile, Run-time, or link-time internationalization ? Date: 2 Nov 1993 23:14:14 +0100 Organization: Technical University of Brno, Czech Republic Lines: 16 Sender: daemon@rhino.cis.vutbr.cz Approved: insoft-l-moderator@cis.vutbr.cz Message-ID: <2b6m3m$gak@rhino.cis.vutbr.cz> Reply-To: <insoft-l@cis.vutbr.cz>