Article View: bne.general
Article #28Re: Timed local calls for Internet users...
From: Gregory Peter Kaloutsis
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 00:00
46 lines
3272 bytes
3272 bytes
michael.wines@purethought.com.au (Michael Wines) wrote: >gkalouts@qnpbnes2.telecom.com.au (Gregory Peter Kaloutsis) wrote: >>Now I have no problems being charged $0.xx for a local call. But I do object to >>paying the same amount when the business man uses; potentially, bandwidth I >>would use. So you have a situation where people think that a local call is >>simply a local call and nothing else. >>Look at like this. Why should a truck pay more for rego than a sedan. And why >>should a bike pay even less than a sedan! If all three travel the same distance >>why the difference. Simply because one uses the infrastructure more than the >>other. The truck wears the roads more and hence pays more etc. >Bad analogy. Trucks tear up roads. Modems don't tear up telephone >lines just by being connected longer. It's not what you connect to a POTS line but rather the time that uses. In switched network time is bandwidth. >>Now in telephony we tend to think in terms of distance only. The longer your >>destination is the more you pay, but telecommunications infrastructure is not >>just distance based. It is also bandwidth based. Bandwidth is related to time >>when it comes to sigle space division usage. ie the line from phone to the >>exchange is mine to use when I like and for how long I like. No one else can >>use that( with the exception of RIM's) line. But the IEN is different. I should >>have just as much right to use these line as any one else paying the same for a >>local call! >This is typical of Telstra's arguments that there is a shortage of >bandwidth, and that scarcity requires rationing. There is no bandwidth >shortage. Telstra's artifically managed shortages are just a >confidence trick to keep prices up so that they can stay fat and lazy. With going too deeply into capacity planning of a network the simple fact is that if 1 in 10 households in our major cities decided to use their telephones for 3 hours plus from say 6 to 9 pm. You better believe that their will be a bandwidth sortage. This is what their trying to avoid. That's my point. Why should Telstra increase their bandwidth (CO$T). Therefore increase theri charges to everyone to cover the expense when its only the long held telephone callers that are causing it. >Michael Wines. >-- >Check out the surf conditions at Bronte beach >The Bronte Surf Report is updated every day >http://www.purethought.com.au/bronte
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4v8cmb$hdi@cdn_news.telecom.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<19960809.7B7AF50.A997@enterprise.powerup.com.au> <4uof1i$5tr@cdn_news.telecom.com.au> <320fd4bd.163353815@news.zip.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fee24,3317c761b87497eb X-Google-Attributes: gidfee24,public X-Google-Thread: 16a005,3317c761b87497eb X-Google-Attributes: gid16a005,public X-Google-Thread: 1380a2,3317c761b87497eb X-Google-Attributes: gid1380a2,public X-Google-Thread: f5379,3317c761b87497eb X-Google-Attributes: gidf5379,public From: gkalouts@qnpbnes2.telecom.com.au (Gregory Peter Kaloutsis) Subject: Re: Timed local calls for Internet users... Date: 1996/08/18 Message-ID: <4v8cmb$hdi@cdn_news.telecom.com.au> X-Deja-AN: 174981474 references: <19960809.7B7AF50.A997@enterprise.powerup.com.au> <4uof1i$5tr@cdn_news.telecom.com.au> <320fd4bd.163353815@news.zip.com.au> organization: Telstra newsgroups: bne.general,aus.computers.amiga,powerup.info,connect.general